TY - JOUR
T1 - Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) clinical practice guideline on the management of primary malignant bone tumors - Secondary publication
AU - Tsuchiya, Kazuaki
AU - Akisue, Toshihiro
AU - Ehara, Shigeru
AU - Kawai, Akira
AU - Kawano, Hirotaka
AU - Hiraga, Hiroaki
AU - Hosono, Ako
AU - Hutani, Hiroyuki
AU - Morii, Takeshi
AU - Morioka, Hideo
AU - Nishida, Yoshihiro
AU - Oda, Yoshinao
AU - Ogose, Akira
AU - Shimose, Shoji
AU - Yamaguchi, Takehiko
AU - Yamamoto, Tetsuji
AU - Yoshida, Masahiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Background: In Japan, there are currently no general guidelines for the treatment of primary malignant bone tumors. Therefore, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association established a committee to develop guidelines for the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of primary malignant bone tumors for medical professionals in clinical practice. Methods: The guidelines were developed in accordance with “Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Handbook 2014″ and “Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual 2017". The Japanese Orthopaedic Association's Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Committee established guideline development and systematic review committees, drawing members from orthopedic specialists leading the diagnosis and treatment of bone and soft tissue tumors. Pediatricians, radiologists, and diagnostic pathologists were added to both committees because of the importance of multidisciplinary treatment. Based on the diagnosis and treatment algorithm for primary malignant bone tumors, important decision-making points were selected, and clinical questions (CQ) were determined. The strength of recommendation was rated on two levels and the strength of evidence was rated on four levels. The recommendations published were selected based on agreement by 70% or more of the voters. Results: The guideline development committee examined the important clinical issues in the clinical algorithm and selected 22 CQs. The systematic review committee reviewed the evidence concerning each CQ and a clinical value judgment was added by experts. Eventually, 25 questions were published and the text of each recommendation was determined. Conclusion: Since primary malignant bone tumors are rare, there is a dearth of strong evidence based on randomized controlled trials, and recommendations cannot be applied to all the patients. In clinical practice, appropriate treatment of patients with primary malignant bone tumors should be based on the histopathological diagnosis and degree of progression of each case, using these guidelines as a reference.
AB - Background: In Japan, there are currently no general guidelines for the treatment of primary malignant bone tumors. Therefore, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association established a committee to develop guidelines for the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of primary malignant bone tumors for medical professionals in clinical practice. Methods: The guidelines were developed in accordance with “Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Handbook 2014″ and “Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual 2017". The Japanese Orthopaedic Association's Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Committee established guideline development and systematic review committees, drawing members from orthopedic specialists leading the diagnosis and treatment of bone and soft tissue tumors. Pediatricians, radiologists, and diagnostic pathologists were added to both committees because of the importance of multidisciplinary treatment. Based on the diagnosis and treatment algorithm for primary malignant bone tumors, important decision-making points were selected, and clinical questions (CQ) were determined. The strength of recommendation was rated on two levels and the strength of evidence was rated on four levels. The recommendations published were selected based on agreement by 70% or more of the voters. Results: The guideline development committee examined the important clinical issues in the clinical algorithm and selected 22 CQs. The systematic review committee reviewed the evidence concerning each CQ and a clinical value judgment was added by experts. Eventually, 25 questions were published and the text of each recommendation was determined. Conclusion: Since primary malignant bone tumors are rare, there is a dearth of strong evidence based on randomized controlled trials, and recommendations cannot be applied to all the patients. In clinical practice, appropriate treatment of patients with primary malignant bone tumors should be based on the histopathological diagnosis and degree of progression of each case, using these guidelines as a reference.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198309404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85198309404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2023.11.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2023.11.007
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39003183
AN - SCOPUS:85198309404
SN - 0949-2658
VL - 30
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
IS - 1
ER -