TY - JOUR
T1 - In vivo dynamic acromiohumeral distance in shoulders with rotator cuff tears
AU - Kozono, Naoya
AU - Okada, Takamitsu
AU - Takeuchi, Naohide
AU - Hamai, Satoshi
AU - Higaki, Hidehiko
AU - Shimoto, Takeshi
AU - Ikebe, Satoru
AU - Gondo, Hirotaka
AU - Nakanishi, Yoshitaka
AU - Senju, Takahiro
AU - Nakashima, Yasuharu
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from the Mizuno Sports Promotion Foundation and a grant from the Japan Sports Medicine Foundation , 2016.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Background: There are no previous studies on the acromiohumeral distance in shoulders with large-to-massive full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In this study, the acromiohumeral distance in rotator cuff tear and healthy shoulders was measured using 3D-to-2D model-to-image registration techniques. Methods: The dynamic glenohumeral kinematics during scapular plane abduction and axial rotation were analyzed in 11 rotator cuff tear patients and 10 healthy control subjects. Periodic radiographic images of scapular plane abduction and axial rotation were taken using a flat-panel radiograph image detector. Movements of the shoulder joint were assessed using radiographic images and computed tomography-derived digitally reconstructed radiographs. The acromiohumeral distance was defined as the shortest 3D distance between the acromion and the proximal humerus. Findings: For scapular plane abduction, the rotator cuff tear group had significantly smaller acromiohumeral distance than the control group at 15° 30° 45° 60° 75° 135° and 150° of humeral abduction (P < 0.05 at each measured angle). For axial rotation in the adducted position, the rotator cuff tear group had significantly smaller acromiohumeral distance than the control group at each point between −20° and 40° of glenohumeral external rotation (P < 0.05 at each measured angle). Interpretation: The minimum measured acromiohumeral distance was 0.9 mm in the rotator cuff tear shoulders and 2.1 mm in the healthy shoulders at 90° of scapular plane abduction. The findings are of clinical relevance because quantitative evaluation of the dynamic acromiohumeral distances in rotator cuff tear and healthy shoulders might provide important insight into subacromial impingement.
AB - Background: There are no previous studies on the acromiohumeral distance in shoulders with large-to-massive full-thickness rotator cuff tears. In this study, the acromiohumeral distance in rotator cuff tear and healthy shoulders was measured using 3D-to-2D model-to-image registration techniques. Methods: The dynamic glenohumeral kinematics during scapular plane abduction and axial rotation were analyzed in 11 rotator cuff tear patients and 10 healthy control subjects. Periodic radiographic images of scapular plane abduction and axial rotation were taken using a flat-panel radiograph image detector. Movements of the shoulder joint were assessed using radiographic images and computed tomography-derived digitally reconstructed radiographs. The acromiohumeral distance was defined as the shortest 3D distance between the acromion and the proximal humerus. Findings: For scapular plane abduction, the rotator cuff tear group had significantly smaller acromiohumeral distance than the control group at 15° 30° 45° 60° 75° 135° and 150° of humeral abduction (P < 0.05 at each measured angle). For axial rotation in the adducted position, the rotator cuff tear group had significantly smaller acromiohumeral distance than the control group at each point between −20° and 40° of glenohumeral external rotation (P < 0.05 at each measured angle). Interpretation: The minimum measured acromiohumeral distance was 0.9 mm in the rotator cuff tear shoulders and 2.1 mm in the healthy shoulders at 90° of scapular plane abduction. The findings are of clinical relevance because quantitative evaluation of the dynamic acromiohumeral distances in rotator cuff tear and healthy shoulders might provide important insight into subacromial impingement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054797057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054797057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.07.017
DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.07.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 30340151
AN - SCOPUS:85054797057
SN - 0268-0033
VL - 60
SP - 95
EP - 99
JO - Clinical Biomechanics
JF - Clinical Biomechanics
ER -