TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact on collision probability by post mission disposal and active debris removal
AU - Kawamoto, Satomi
AU - Nagaoka, Nobuaki
AU - Sato, Tsuyoshi
AU - Hanada, Toshiya
N1 - Funding Information:
We used JAXA Supercomputer System generation 2 (JSS2). The initial population for this study was provided by the ESA Space Debris Office. I would like to thank Mr. Joe Carroll and Dr. Akira Kato for useful discussions. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - The collision probabilities of debris objects with and without Post Mission Disposal (PMD) and Active Debris Removal (ADR) are evaluated and discussed. A debris evolutionary model named NEODEEM was jointly developed by Kyushu University and JAXA for use in predicting future debris populations and calculating collision probabilities. The collision probability in each altitude bin is initially compared with and without PMD or ADR. Then a case involving a large satellite constellation is also discussed. The effective number of debris objects at each altitude for the PMD success rates of the large constellation and the collision probability at each altitude are calculated. The collision probability per unit time will increase when a small satellite utilizes a drag augmentation sail or a tether as a PMD device, but the dwell time will be greatly reduced. A collision with a sail or tether will be non-catastrophic collision. Therefore, the use of such devices will reduce the cumulative collision probability and expected number of debris fragments.
AB - The collision probabilities of debris objects with and without Post Mission Disposal (PMD) and Active Debris Removal (ADR) are evaluated and discussed. A debris evolutionary model named NEODEEM was jointly developed by Kyushu University and JAXA for use in predicting future debris populations and calculating collision probabilities. The collision probability in each altitude bin is initially compared with and without PMD or ADR. Then a case involving a large satellite constellation is also discussed. The effective number of debris objects at each altitude for the PMD success rates of the large constellation and the collision probability at each altitude are calculated. The collision probability per unit time will increase when a small satellite utilizes a drag augmentation sail or a tether as a PMD device, but the dwell time will be greatly reduced. A collision with a sail or tether will be non-catastrophic collision. Therefore, the use of such devices will reduce the cumulative collision probability and expected number of debris fragments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087941794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087941794&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsse.2020.07.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jsse.2020.07.012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087941794
SN - 2468-8975
VL - 7
SP - 178
EP - 191
JO - Journal of Space Safety Engineering
JF - Journal of Space Safety Engineering
IS - 3
ER -