TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes during nephroureterectomy in patients with clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial cancer
T2 - Subanalysis of a multi-institutional nationwide case series of the Japanese Urological Association
AU - Cancer Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association
AU - Inokuchi, Junichi
AU - Eto, Masatoshi
AU - Hara, Tomohiko
AU - Fujimoto, Hiroyuki
AU - Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
AU - Miyazaki, Jun
AU - Kikuchi, Eiji
AU - Hinotsu, Shiro
AU - Koie, Takuya
AU - Ohyama, Chikara
AU - Kanayama, Hiroomi
AU - Miki, Tsuneharu
AU - Suzuki, Kazuhiro
AU - Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
AU - Fukumori, Tomoharu
AU - Naito, Seiji
N1 - Funding Information:
These clinicopathological statistics are the results of contributions from a number of institutions in Japan. We are grateful for the cooperation of many Japanese urologists. This document was created by the Cancer Registration Committee of the JUA.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on the clinical outcomes during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC).Methods: Within the nationwide case series of the Japanese Urological Association, which comprises 1509 patients with UTUC diagnosed in 2005, we identified 823 patients with clinically node-negative UTUC who underwent RNU. The extent of limited LND was defined as the renal hilar region only for renal pelvic cancer and as either the pelvic region or para-aortic/paracaval region only for ureteral cancer, while the extent of wider LND was defined as at least one perilesional LND region in addition to limited LND. Multivariate analysis with a Cox regression hazard model was used to evaluate the survival benefit. Results: Among the 823 patients, LND was performed in 197 (23.9%) patients, and 26 (13.2%) of them had pathologically node-positive disease. Of 197 patients who underwent LND, limited and wider LND was performed in 119 (60.4%) and 78 (39.6%) patients, respectively. Patients with node-positive disease showed significantly shorter overall survival than those with node-negative disease. No LND-associated survival improvement was observed in a direct comparison between patients with and without LND. In addition, limited or wider LND was not associated with overall survival or cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: The therapeutic benefit obtained by LND remains unclear regardless of the extent of LND, although LND has diagnostic value with respect to the prediction of a poor prognosis especially in patients with clinically muscle-invasive disease.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on the clinical outcomes during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC).Methods: Within the nationwide case series of the Japanese Urological Association, which comprises 1509 patients with UTUC diagnosed in 2005, we identified 823 patients with clinically node-negative UTUC who underwent RNU. The extent of limited LND was defined as the renal hilar region only for renal pelvic cancer and as either the pelvic region or para-aortic/paracaval region only for ureteral cancer, while the extent of wider LND was defined as at least one perilesional LND region in addition to limited LND. Multivariate analysis with a Cox regression hazard model was used to evaluate the survival benefit. Results: Among the 823 patients, LND was performed in 197 (23.9%) patients, and 26 (13.2%) of them had pathologically node-positive disease. Of 197 patients who underwent LND, limited and wider LND was performed in 119 (60.4%) and 78 (39.6%) patients, respectively. Patients with node-positive disease showed significantly shorter overall survival than those with node-negative disease. No LND-associated survival improvement was observed in a direct comparison between patients with and without LND. In addition, limited or wider LND was not associated with overall survival or cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: The therapeutic benefit obtained by LND remains unclear regardless of the extent of LND, although LND has diagnostic value with respect to the prediction of a poor prognosis especially in patients with clinically muscle-invasive disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021761350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021761350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jjco/hyx051
DO - 10.1093/jjco/hyx051
M3 - Article
C2 - 28398494
AN - SCOPUS:85021761350
SN - 0368-2811
VL - 47
SP - 652
EP - 659
JO - Japanese journal of clinical oncology
JF - Japanese journal of clinical oncology
IS - 7
ER -