TY - JOUR
T1 - Immunohistochemical and scanning electron microscopic comparison of the collagen network constructions between pig, goat and chicken livers
AU - Nishimura, Shotaro
AU - Sagara, Ayano
AU - Oshima, Ichiro
AU - Ono, Yoshitaka
AU - Iwamoto, Hisao
AU - Okano, Kaoru
AU - Miyachi, Hideyuki
AU - Tabata, Shoji
PY - 2009/8/1
Y1 - 2009/8/1
N2 - The distribution and three-dimensional architecture of collagen fibers were compared between pig, goat and chicken livers. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that collagen type I was identified in the interlobular connective tissue region and intralobular areas in pigs and goats. Type III collagen was also identified in the interlobular connective tissue region and intralobular sinusoidal walls. In the chicken liver, only the circumference region of the vessels was immunostained with collagen type I and III antibodies and the interlobular connective tissue wall could not be distinguished clearly. In the intralobular region, collagen type I antibody immunoreacted around the hepatic cells but collagen type III antibody immunoreacted weakly. In the NaOH macerated specimen, well-developed collagen bundles formed the prominent interlobular walls in pigs. In contrast, the wall in the goat liver comprised a thin layer of the bundles. In the chicken liver, there were no notable collagen septa between lobules. The intralobular collagen construction was quite different between the animals, indicating a fragile collagen fibril networks in pigs, a robust framework in goats and dense fabric-like septa in chickens. These results indicate that the distinct collagen frameworks may contribute to the histological strength of the livers in each of the animal species.
AB - The distribution and three-dimensional architecture of collagen fibers were compared between pig, goat and chicken livers. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that collagen type I was identified in the interlobular connective tissue region and intralobular areas in pigs and goats. Type III collagen was also identified in the interlobular connective tissue region and intralobular sinusoidal walls. In the chicken liver, only the circumference region of the vessels was immunostained with collagen type I and III antibodies and the interlobular connective tissue wall could not be distinguished clearly. In the intralobular region, collagen type I antibody immunoreacted around the hepatic cells but collagen type III antibody immunoreacted weakly. In the NaOH macerated specimen, well-developed collagen bundles formed the prominent interlobular walls in pigs. In contrast, the wall in the goat liver comprised a thin layer of the bundles. In the chicken liver, there were no notable collagen septa between lobules. The intralobular collagen construction was quite different between the animals, indicating a fragile collagen fibril networks in pigs, a robust framework in goats and dense fabric-like septa in chickens. These results indicate that the distinct collagen frameworks may contribute to the histological strength of the livers in each of the animal species.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68349128094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68349128094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00660.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00660.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20163607
AN - SCOPUS:68349128094
SN - 1344-3941
VL - 80
SP - 451
EP - 459
JO - Animal Science Journal
JF - Animal Science Journal
IS - 4
ER -