TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging and clinical correlates with regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer
AU - Khan, Khurum
AU - Cascinu, Stefano
AU - Cunningham, David
AU - Kim, Sun Young
AU - Oki, Eiji
AU - Seery, Tara
AU - Shen, Lin
AU - Siena, Salvatore
AU - Tournigand, Christophe
AU - Turhal, Nazim Serdar
AU - Hendlisz, Alain
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Professor Dow-Mu Koh (The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK) for the imaging analysis for the PROSPECT-R study, Professor Angelo Vanzulli (Niguarda Cancer center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda and Universit? degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy) for the imaging analysis in the Radio-CORRECT study, and Erwin Woff and Patrick Flamen (Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium) for the imaging analysis in the RegARd-C study. We also thank the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Medical writing support was provided by Yvonne E. Yarker, PhD, CMPP of OPEN Health Medical Communications (Choice) in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines, with financial support from Bayer. Bayer funded editorial assistance for the development of the review and was allowed to review the manuscript for factual correctness but did not influence the content or decision to publish. All authors contributed to the conception, writing, and critically reviewing the content of the article. All authors approved the final version for submission. SC reports grants from Bayer. DC reports grants from 4SC, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi. KK reports a non-financial advisory role with Bayer. EO reports presentation fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck, Taiho Pharma, and Takeda, and other relationships with Bayer Yakuhin. SS reports advisory board membership with Amgen, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, CheckmAb, Clovis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Incyte, Merck, Novartis, Roche-Genentech, and Seattle Genetics. CT reports advisory board fees from Bayer. AH, SY-K, LS, TS, and NST declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank Professor Dow-Mu Koh (The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK) for the imaging analysis for the PROSPECT-R study, Professor Angelo Vanzulli (Niguarda Cancer center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy) for the imaging analysis in the Radio-CORRECT study, and Erwin Woff and Patrick Flamen (Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium) for the imaging analysis in the RegARd-C study. We also thank the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation and the Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Medical writing support was provided by Yvonne E. Yarker, PhD, CMPP of OPEN Health Medical Communications (Choice) in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines, with financial support from Bayer.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - In colorectal cancer (CRC), imaging is important in determining tumor stage, selecting treatment strategies, and in assessing response to therapy. However, some challenges remain with established imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, and with some commonly used response criteria, such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, which measures change in size of several target lesions instead of change in tumor morphology or metabolic function. In addition, these assessments are not typically conducted until after 8 weeks of treatment, meaning that potential non-responders are often not identified in a timely manner. Regorafenib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of metastatic CRC, blocks the activity of several protein kinases involved in angiogenesis, oncogenesis, metastasis, and tumor immunity. Timely differentiation of regorafenib responders from non-responders using appropriate imaging techniques that recognize not only changes in tumor size but also changes in tumor density or vasculature, may reduce unnecessary drug-related toxicity in patients who are unlikely to respond to treatment. This review discusses the latest developments in computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography tumor imaging modalities, and how these aid in identifying patients with metastatic CRC who are responders or non-responders to regorafenib treatment.
AB - In colorectal cancer (CRC), imaging is important in determining tumor stage, selecting treatment strategies, and in assessing response to therapy. However, some challenges remain with established imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, and with some commonly used response criteria, such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, which measures change in size of several target lesions instead of change in tumor morphology or metabolic function. In addition, these assessments are not typically conducted until after 8 weeks of treatment, meaning that potential non-responders are often not identified in a timely manner. Regorafenib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of metastatic CRC, blocks the activity of several protein kinases involved in angiogenesis, oncogenesis, metastasis, and tumor immunity. Timely differentiation of regorafenib responders from non-responders using appropriate imaging techniques that recognize not only changes in tumor size but also changes in tumor density or vasculature, may reduce unnecessary drug-related toxicity in patients who are unlikely to respond to treatment. This review discusses the latest developments in computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography tumor imaging modalities, and how these aid in identifying patients with metastatic CRC who are responders or non-responders to regorafenib treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082829215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082829215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102020
DO - 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102020
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32278232
AN - SCOPUS:85082829215
SN - 0305-7372
VL - 86
JO - Cancer Treatment Reviews
JF - Cancer Treatment Reviews
M1 - 102020
ER -