Holocene relative sea level history from phreatic overgrowths on speleothems (POS) on Minami Daito Island, Northern Philippine Sea

Blaž Miklavič, Yusuke Yokoyama, Kensaku Urata, Yosuke Miyairi, Hironobu Kan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research aims to elucidate the Holocene sea level (SL) variability on Minami Daito Island, Japan, where no previous such research has been done due to the apparent absence of any SL indicators. Here we use phreatic overgrowths on speleothems (POS) in a cave as an alternative SL indicator. The relationship between the highest modern groundwater fluctuation level (GWFL) and the highest POS level was studied, and the oldest POS calcite was dated using the radiocarbon method considering the dead carbon proportion (the “reservoir effect”). The results show that SL reached its Holocene maximum between ca. 5.1 and 4.6 ka cal BP, after which it remained more or less stable till the present day, with a possible minor sea-level drawdown of ca. 30–35 cm. Although the timing of the maximum Holocene SL coincides with mid-Holocene SL highstand observed across the tropical and subtropical Indo-Pacific, the relative stability of the SL after reaching its peak is not expected in the given subtropical setting. The SL on Minami Daito did not have a distinct highstand in the Holocene and instead followed closely the eustatic sea-level change. These findings are important in better understanding the mechanisms that control local relative SL variability and show the high value of POS as precise SL indicator.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-368
Number of pages10
JournalQuaternary International
Volume471
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Earth-Surface Processes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Holocene relative sea level history from phreatic overgrowths on speleothems (POS) on Minami Daito Island, Northern Philippine Sea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this