TY - JOUR
T1 - Highly efficient PCR assay to discriminate allelic DNA methylation status using whole genome amplification
AU - Yamada, Yoichi
AU - Ito, Takashi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a research grant from the Genome Network Project from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Background: We previously developed a simple method termed HpaII-McrBC PCR (HM-PCR) to discriminate allelic methylation status of the genomic sites of interest, and successfully applied it to a comprehensive analysis of CpG islands (CGIs) on human chromosome 21q. However, HM-PCR requires 200 ng of genomic DNA to examine one target site, thereby precluding its application to such samples that are limited in quantity. Findings. We developed HpaII-McrBC whole-genome-amplification PCR (HM-WGA-PCR) that uses whole-genome-amplified DNA as the template. HM-WGA-PCR uses only 1/100th the genomic template material required for HM-PCR. Indeed, we successfully analyzed 147 CGIs by HM-WGA-PCR using only ∼300 ng of DNA, whereas previous HM-PCR study had required ∼30 g. Furthermore, we confirmed that allelic methylation status revealed by HM-WGA-PCR is identical to that by HM-PCR in every case of the 147 CGIs tested, proving high consistency between the two methods. Conclusions: HM-WGA-PCR would serve as a reliable alternative to HM-PCR in the analysis of allelic methylation status when the quantity of DNA available is limited.
AB - Background: We previously developed a simple method termed HpaII-McrBC PCR (HM-PCR) to discriminate allelic methylation status of the genomic sites of interest, and successfully applied it to a comprehensive analysis of CpG islands (CGIs) on human chromosome 21q. However, HM-PCR requires 200 ng of genomic DNA to examine one target site, thereby precluding its application to such samples that are limited in quantity. Findings. We developed HpaII-McrBC whole-genome-amplification PCR (HM-WGA-PCR) that uses whole-genome-amplified DNA as the template. HM-WGA-PCR uses only 1/100th the genomic template material required for HM-PCR. Indeed, we successfully analyzed 147 CGIs by HM-WGA-PCR using only ∼300 ng of DNA, whereas previous HM-PCR study had required ∼30 g. Furthermore, we confirmed that allelic methylation status revealed by HM-WGA-PCR is identical to that by HM-PCR in every case of the 147 CGIs tested, proving high consistency between the two methods. Conclusions: HM-WGA-PCR would serve as a reliable alternative to HM-PCR in the analysis of allelic methylation status when the quantity of DNA available is limited.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79958146649&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79958146649&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1756-0500-4-179
DO - 10.1186/1756-0500-4-179
M3 - Article
C2 - 21663670
AN - SCOPUS:79958146649
SN - 1756-0500
VL - 4
JO - BMC research notes
JF - BMC research notes
M1 - 179
ER -