TY - JOUR
T1 - Global impact of COVID-19 on surgeons and team members (GlobalCOST)
T2 - a cross-sectional study
AU - Jaffry, Zahra
AU - Raj, Siddarth
AU - Sallam, Asser
AU - Lyman, Stephen
AU - Negida, Ahmed
AU - Yiu, Chi Fung Antony
AU - Sobti, Anshul
AU - Bua, Nelson
AU - Field, Richard E.
AU - Abdalla, Hassan
AU - Hammad, Rawad
AU - Qazi, Nadeem
AU - Singh, Bijayendra
AU - Brennan, Peter A.
AU - Hussein, Amr
AU - Narvani, Ali
AU - Jones, Adrian
AU - Imam, Mohamed A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - Objectives To investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the well-being of surgeons and allied health professionals as well as the support provided by their institutions. Design This cross-sectional study involved distributing an online survey through medical organisations, social media platforms and collaborators. Setting It included all staff based in an operating theatre environment around the world. Participants 1590 complete responses were received from 54 countries between 15 July and 15 December 2020. The average age of participants was 30-40 years old, 64.9% were men and 32.5% of a white ethnic background. 79.5% were surgeons with the remainder being nurses, assistants, anaesthetists, operating department practitioners or classified other. Main outcome measures Participants that had experienced any physical illness, changes in mental health, salary or time with family since the start of the pandemic as well as support available based on published recommendations. Results 32.0% reported becoming physically ill. This was more likely in those with reduced access to personal protective equipment (OR 4.62; CI 2.82 to 7.56; p<0.001) and regular breaks (OR 1.56; CI 1.18 to 2.06; p=0.002). Those with a decrease in salary (29.0%) were more likely to have an increase in anxiety (OR 1.50; CI 1.19 to 1.89; p=0.001) and depression (OR 1.84; CI 1.40 to 2.43; p<0.001) and those who spent less time with family (35.2%) were more likely to have an increase in depression (OR 1.74; CI 1.34 to 2.26; p<0.001). Only 36.0% had easy access to occupational health, 44.0% to mental health services, 16.5% to 24/7 rest facilities and 14.2% to 24/7 food and drink facilities. Fewer measures were available in countries with a low Human Development Index. Conclusions This work has highlighted a need and strategies to improve conditions for the healthcare workforce, ultimately benefiting patient care.
AB - Objectives To investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the well-being of surgeons and allied health professionals as well as the support provided by their institutions. Design This cross-sectional study involved distributing an online survey through medical organisations, social media platforms and collaborators. Setting It included all staff based in an operating theatre environment around the world. Participants 1590 complete responses were received from 54 countries between 15 July and 15 December 2020. The average age of participants was 30-40 years old, 64.9% were men and 32.5% of a white ethnic background. 79.5% were surgeons with the remainder being nurses, assistants, anaesthetists, operating department practitioners or classified other. Main outcome measures Participants that had experienced any physical illness, changes in mental health, salary or time with family since the start of the pandemic as well as support available based on published recommendations. Results 32.0% reported becoming physically ill. This was more likely in those with reduced access to personal protective equipment (OR 4.62; CI 2.82 to 7.56; p<0.001) and regular breaks (OR 1.56; CI 1.18 to 2.06; p=0.002). Those with a decrease in salary (29.0%) were more likely to have an increase in anxiety (OR 1.50; CI 1.19 to 1.89; p=0.001) and depression (OR 1.84; CI 1.40 to 2.43; p<0.001) and those who spent less time with family (35.2%) were more likely to have an increase in depression (OR 1.74; CI 1.34 to 2.26; p<0.001). Only 36.0% had easy access to occupational health, 44.0% to mental health services, 16.5% to 24/7 rest facilities and 14.2% to 24/7 food and drink facilities. Fewer measures were available in countries with a low Human Development Index. Conclusions This work has highlighted a need and strategies to improve conditions for the healthcare workforce, ultimately benefiting patient care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136045431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136045431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059873
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059873
M3 - Article
C2 - 36378650
AN - SCOPUS:85136045431
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
JO - BMJ open
JF - BMJ open
IS - 8
M1 - 059873
ER -