TY - GEN
T1 - Generalizing envy-freeness toward group of agents
AU - Todo, Taiki
AU - Li, Runcong
AU - Hu, Xuemei
AU - Mouri, Takayuki
AU - Iwasaki, Atsushi
AU - Yokoo, Makoto
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Envy-freeness is a well-known fairness concept for analyzing mechanisms. Its traditional definition requires that no individual envies another individual. However, an individual (or a group of agents) may envy another group, even if she (or they) does not envy another individual. In mechanisms with monetary transfer, such as combinatorial auctions, considering such fairness requirements, which are refinements of traditional envy-freeness, is meaningful and brings up a new interesting research direction in mechanism design. In this paper, we introduce two new concepts of fairness called envy-freeness of an individual toward a group, and envy-freeness of a group toward a group . They are natural extensions of traditional envy-freeness. We discuss combinatorial auction mechanisms that satisfy these concepts. First, we characterize such mechanisms by focusing on their allocation rules. Then we clarify the connections between these concepts and three other properties: the core, strategy-proofness, and false-name-proofness.
AB - Envy-freeness is a well-known fairness concept for analyzing mechanisms. Its traditional definition requires that no individual envies another individual. However, an individual (or a group of agents) may envy another group, even if she (or they) does not envy another individual. In mechanisms with monetary transfer, such as combinatorial auctions, considering such fairness requirements, which are refinements of traditional envy-freeness, is meaningful and brings up a new interesting research direction in mechanism design. In this paper, we introduce two new concepts of fairness called envy-freeness of an individual toward a group, and envy-freeness of a group toward a group . They are natural extensions of traditional envy-freeness. We discuss combinatorial auction mechanisms that satisfy these concepts. First, we characterize such mechanisms by focusing on their allocation rules. Then we clarify the connections between these concepts and three other properties: the core, strategy-proofness, and false-name-proofness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881053631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881053631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-073
DO - 10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-073
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84881053631
SN - 9781577355120
T3 - IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
SP - 386
EP - 392
BT - IJCAI 2011 - 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
T2 - 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2011
Y2 - 16 July 2011 through 22 July 2011
ER -