TY - JOUR
T1 - Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using novel 26-mm articulating devices
T2 - an ex vivo comparative and in vivo feasibility study
AU - Nakadate, Ryu
AU - Nakamura, Shotaro
AU - Moriyama, Tomohiko
AU - Kenmotsu, Hajime
AU - Oguri, Susumu
AU - Arata, Jumpei
AU - Uemura, Munenori
AU - Ohuchida, Kenoki
AU - Akahoshi, Tomohiko
AU - Ikeda, Tetsuo
AU - Hashizume, Makoto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Background and study aims: The conventional procedure of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically demanding. This study investigated the efficiency of novel articulating devices (maximum diameter 2.6mm), which can be used with commercially available, standard endoscopes. Patients and methods: In an ex vivo comparative study, eight endoscopists were divided into novices and experienced operators, and performed ESD using new devices and the conventional setup. An in vivo animal experiment was performed by two experts. Procedure times for incision and dissection were recorded, and unit times for circumferential length and area of specimens were calculated. Results: All procedures were successfully completed with en bloc resection. In the ex vivo study, the unit procedure times for incision and dissection by novices were significantly shorter using the new system (P<0.01 and P<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference for experienced endoscopists. Perforation occurred during one procedure in which the new system was used. The in vivo experiments were successfully completed without adverse events. Conclusions: ESD using novel articulating devices was feasible. These devices were able to reduce the procedure time for novices.
AB - Background and study aims: The conventional procedure of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically demanding. This study investigated the efficiency of novel articulating devices (maximum diameter 2.6mm), which can be used with commercially available, standard endoscopes. Patients and methods: In an ex vivo comparative study, eight endoscopists were divided into novices and experienced operators, and performed ESD using new devices and the conventional setup. An in vivo animal experiment was performed by two experts. Procedure times for incision and dissection were recorded, and unit times for circumferential length and area of specimens were calculated. Results: All procedures were successfully completed with en bloc resection. In the ex vivo study, the unit procedure times for incision and dissection by novices were significantly shorter using the new system (P<0.01 and P<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference for experienced endoscopists. Perforation occurred during one procedure in which the new system was used. The in vivo experiments were successfully completed without adverse events. Conclusions: ESD using novel articulating devices was feasible. These devices were able to reduce the procedure time for novices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940373606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940373606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0034-1391438
DO - 10.1055/s-0034-1391438
M3 - Article
C2 - 25668427
AN - SCOPUS:84940373606
SN - 0013-726X
VL - 47
SP - 820
EP - 824
JO - Endoscopy
JF - Endoscopy
IS - 9
ER -