From justification to modulation: Similarities and differences of after all and datte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The English discourse marker after all and the Japanese discourse marker datte have been commonly claimed to give a reason or justification to the preceding utterance, and therefore, these two expressions are regarded as the equivalent translation counterparts to each other. This paper first attempts to propose that such an equated account is motivated by these two discourse markers constructing a similar inferential schema involved in the interpretation of the utterance including them. In fact, datte and after all make manifest similar polyfunctions according to the syntactic position although they encode different lexical information. This is because these two discourse markers are indicators that contribute to the inferential phase of communication by various degrees of modulation of a cognitive gap between two different assumptions. Another aim of this paper is to differentiate a procedural constraint these two indicators encode on the interpretation of the utterance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-362
Number of pages26
JournalPragmatics and Cognition
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Dec 31 2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Computer Science
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • History and Philosophy of Science


Dive into the research topics of 'From justification to modulation: Similarities and differences of after all and datte'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this