TY - JOUR
T1 - FDG uptake heterogeneity evaluated by fractal analysis improves the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules
AU - Miwa, Kenta
AU - Inubushi, Masayuki
AU - Wagatsuma, Kei
AU - Nagao, Michinobu
AU - Murata, Taisuke
AU - Koyama, Masamichi
AU - Koizumi, Mitsuru
AU - Sasaki, Masayuki
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Purpose The present study aimed to determine whether fractal analysis of morphological complexity and intratumoral heterogeneity of FDG uptake can help to differentiate malignant from benign pulmonary nodules. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 54 patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were examined by FDG PET/CT. Pathological assessments of biopsy specimens confirmed 35 and 19 nodules as NSCLC and inflammatory lesions, respectively. The morphological fractal dimension (m-FD), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and density fractal dimension (d-FD) of target nodules were calculated from CT and PET images. Fractal dimension is a quantitative index of morphological complexity and tracer uptake heterogeneity; higher values indicate increased complexity and heterogeneity. Results The m-FD, SUVmax and d-FD significantly differed between malignant and benign pulmonary nodules (p < 0.05). Although the diagnostic ability was better for d-FD than m-FD and SUVmax, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Tumor size correlated significantly with SUVmax (r = 0.51, p < 0.05), but not with either m-FD or d-FD. Furthermore, m-FD combined with either SUVmax or d-FD improved diagnostic accuracy to 92.6% and 94.4%, respectively. Conclusion The d-FD of intratumoral heterogeneity of FDG uptake can help to differentially diagnose malignant and benign pulmonary nodules. The SUVmax and d-FD obtained from FDG-PET images provide different types of information that are equally useful for differential diagnoses. Furthermore, the morphological complexity determined by CT combined with heterogeneous FDG uptake determined by PET improved diagnostic accuracy.
AB - Purpose The present study aimed to determine whether fractal analysis of morphological complexity and intratumoral heterogeneity of FDG uptake can help to differentiate malignant from benign pulmonary nodules. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 54 patients with suspected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were examined by FDG PET/CT. Pathological assessments of biopsy specimens confirmed 35 and 19 nodules as NSCLC and inflammatory lesions, respectively. The morphological fractal dimension (m-FD), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and density fractal dimension (d-FD) of target nodules were calculated from CT and PET images. Fractal dimension is a quantitative index of morphological complexity and tracer uptake heterogeneity; higher values indicate increased complexity and heterogeneity. Results The m-FD, SUVmax and d-FD significantly differed between malignant and benign pulmonary nodules (p < 0.05). Although the diagnostic ability was better for d-FD than m-FD and SUVmax, the difference did not reach statistical significance. Tumor size correlated significantly with SUVmax (r = 0.51, p < 0.05), but not with either m-FD or d-FD. Furthermore, m-FD combined with either SUVmax or d-FD improved diagnostic accuracy to 92.6% and 94.4%, respectively. Conclusion The d-FD of intratumoral heterogeneity of FDG uptake can help to differentially diagnose malignant and benign pulmonary nodules. The SUVmax and d-FD obtained from FDG-PET images provide different types of information that are equally useful for differential diagnoses. Furthermore, the morphological complexity determined by CT combined with heterogeneous FDG uptake determined by PET improved diagnostic accuracy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895171498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895171498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.12.020
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.12.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 24418285
AN - SCOPUS:84895171498
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 83
SP - 715
EP - 719
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
IS - 4
ER -