TY - JOUR
T1 - Express railway disaster in amagasaki
T2 - A review of urban disaster response capacity in Japan
AU - Nagata, Takashi
AU - Rosborough, Stephanie N.
AU - Vanrooyen, Michael J.
AU - Kozawa, Shuichi
AU - Ukai, Takashi
AU - Nakayama, Shinichi
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Introduction: On the morning of 25 April 2005, a Japan Railway express train derailed in an urban area of Amagasaki, Japan. The crash was Japan's worst rail disaster in 40 years.This study chroniclesthe rescue efforts and highlights the capacity of Japan's urban disaster response.Methods: Public reports were gathered from the media, Internet, government, fire department, and railway company. Four key informants, who were close to the disaster response, were interviewed to corroborate publicdata and highlight challenges facing the response.Results: The crash left 107 passengers dead and 549 injured. First responders, most of whom were volunteers, were helpful in the rescue effort, and no lives were lost due to transport delays or faulty triage. Responders criticized an early decision to withdraw rescue efforts, a delay in heliport set-up, the inefficiency of the information and instruction center, and emphasized the need for training in confined space medicine. Communication and chain-of-command problems created confusion at the scene.Conclusions: The urban disaster response to the train crash in Amagasaki was rapid and effective.The KobeEarthquake and other incidents sparked changes that improved disaster preparedness in Amagasaki. However, communication and cooperation among responders were hampered, as in previous disasters, by the lack of a structured command system. Application of an incident command system may improve disaster coordination in Japan.
AB - Introduction: On the morning of 25 April 2005, a Japan Railway express train derailed in an urban area of Amagasaki, Japan. The crash was Japan's worst rail disaster in 40 years.This study chroniclesthe rescue efforts and highlights the capacity of Japan's urban disaster response.Methods: Public reports were gathered from the media, Internet, government, fire department, and railway company. Four key informants, who were close to the disaster response, were interviewed to corroborate publicdata and highlight challenges facing the response.Results: The crash left 107 passengers dead and 549 injured. First responders, most of whom were volunteers, were helpful in the rescue effort, and no lives were lost due to transport delays or faulty triage. Responders criticized an early decision to withdraw rescue efforts, a delay in heliport set-up, the inefficiency of the information and instruction center, and emphasized the need for training in confined space medicine. Communication and chain-of-command problems created confusion at the scene.Conclusions: The urban disaster response to the train crash in Amagasaki was rapid and effective.The KobeEarthquake and other incidents sparked changes that improved disaster preparedness in Amagasaki. However, communication and cooperation among responders were hampered, as in previous disasters, by the lack of a structured command system. Application of an incident command system may improve disaster coordination in Japan.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947524652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947524652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1049023X0000399X
DO - 10.1017/S1049023X0000399X
M3 - Article
C2 - 17297906
AN - SCOPUS:33947524652
SN - 1049-023X
VL - 21
SP - 345
EP - 352
JO - Prehospital and disaster medicine
JF - Prehospital and disaster medicine
IS - 5
ER -