Evaluation of link system between repository and researcher database

Kensuke Baba, Toshie Tanaka, Emi Ishita, Masao Mori, Eisuke Ito, Sachio Hirokawa

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effect of a Web system which activates institutional repositories. Institutional repository is an important service of libraries in academic institutions. The authors developed a link system between the institutional repository and the researcher database of their university. The system reduces the efforts of researchers by reusing the metadata in the researcher database for registrations of their papers to the repository. The authors observed the access log of the repository before and after the start up of the link system. The result shows that the system increased the number of access, however there was no significant change on the number of registration of papers.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDigital Libraries
Subtitle of host publicationFor Cultural Heritage, Knowledge Dissemination, and Future Creation - 13th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2011, Proceedings
Pages381-382
Number of pages2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Event13th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2011 - Beijing, China
Duration: Oct 24 2011Oct 27 2011

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume7008 LNCS
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Other

Other13th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2011
Country/TerritoryChina
CityBeijing
Period10/24/1110/27/11

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Computer Science(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of link system between repository and researcher database'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this