TY - JOUR
T1 - Erlotinib Plus Bevacizumab Phase ll Study in Patients with Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer (JO25567)
T2 - Updated Safety Results
AU - Kato, Terufumi
AU - Seto, Takashi
AU - Nishio, Makoto
AU - Goto, Koichi
AU - Yamamoto, Noboru
AU - Okamoto, Isamu
AU - Tao, Liang
AU - Yu, Wei
AU - Khaznadar, Tarik
AU - Tajima, Kosei
AU - Shibata, Masahiko
AU - Seki, Akihiro
AU - Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the investigators, the patients, and their families for their contribution to this clinical study. The authors also thank Naohito Inagaki of Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd for useful discussions. The JO25567 study was sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Support for third-party writing assistance under the direction of the authors for this manuscript was provided by Joanna Musgrove MRes of Gardiner-Caldwell Communications and was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Funding Information:
Funding The JO25567 study was sponsored by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Support for third-party writing assistance under the direction of the authors for this manuscript was provided by Joanna Musgrove MRes of Gardiner-Caldwell Communications and was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, The Author(s).
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - Introduction: The phase II JO25567 study compared the efficacy and safety of erlotinib plus bevacizumab vs. erlotinib alone as first-line therapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Objective: Our objective is to provide updated analyses of safety and the assessment of manageability of specific adverse events. Methods: Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent, non-squamous, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were randomized to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab or erlotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Adverse event frequency rates, predictability and manageability, reasons for discontinuation, time to onset, and outcomes of specific adverse events were analyzed. Results: The safety analysis population comprised 152 randomized patients (75 erlotinib plus bevacizumab; 77 erlotinib) who received at least one dose of study drug between February 2011 and March 2012. There was no difference in overall incidence of serious adverse events between arms, but more grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported with erlotinib plus bevacizumab (90.7%) than with erlotinib (53.2%), primarily due to grade 3 hypertension. Hypertension was controllable with antihypertensive medications in most cases. Proteinuria and bleeding were also more frequently reported with erlotinib plus bevacizumab than with erlotinib but were manageable and did not lead to early discontinuations. Conclusions: The addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib prolonged progression-free survival in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Follow-up safety data were consistent with the known safety profiles of both erlotinib and bevacizumab in NSCLC; this combination appeared to be manageable, and treatment was well tolerated. JapicCTI-111390.
AB - Introduction: The phase II JO25567 study compared the efficacy and safety of erlotinib plus bevacizumab vs. erlotinib alone as first-line therapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Objective: Our objective is to provide updated analyses of safety and the assessment of manageability of specific adverse events. Methods: Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent, non-squamous, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were randomized to receive erlotinib plus bevacizumab or erlotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Adverse event frequency rates, predictability and manageability, reasons for discontinuation, time to onset, and outcomes of specific adverse events were analyzed. Results: The safety analysis population comprised 152 randomized patients (75 erlotinib plus bevacizumab; 77 erlotinib) who received at least one dose of study drug between February 2011 and March 2012. There was no difference in overall incidence of serious adverse events between arms, but more grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported with erlotinib plus bevacizumab (90.7%) than with erlotinib (53.2%), primarily due to grade 3 hypertension. Hypertension was controllable with antihypertensive medications in most cases. Proteinuria and bleeding were also more frequently reported with erlotinib plus bevacizumab than with erlotinib but were manageable and did not lead to early discontinuations. Conclusions: The addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib prolonged progression-free survival in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Follow-up safety data were consistent with the known safety profiles of both erlotinib and bevacizumab in NSCLC; this combination appeared to be manageable, and treatment was well tolerated. JapicCTI-111390.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031501873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031501873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40264-017-0596-0
DO - 10.1007/s40264-017-0596-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 29043496
AN - SCOPUS:85031501873
SN - 0114-5916
VL - 41
SP - 229
EP - 237
JO - Drug Safety
JF - Drug Safety
IS - 2
ER -