TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with a moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimen
T2 - a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study in patients with gynecologic cancer receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin
AU - Yahata, Hideaki
AU - Kobayashi, Hiroaki
AU - Sonoda, Kenzo
AU - Shimokawa, Mototsugu
AU - Ohgami, Tatsuhiro
AU - Saito, Toshiaki
AU - Ogawa, Shinji
AU - Sakai, Kunihiro
AU - Ichinoe, Akimasa
AU - Ueoka, Yousuke
AU - Hasuo, Yasuyuki
AU - Nishida, Makoto
AU - Masuda, Satohiro
AU - Kato, Kiyoko
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Numbers 24592520 and 24592519).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Background: Substance P contributes to the hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) to paclitaxel in a rat model. Aprepitant acts as an inhibitor of the binding of substance P to the neurokinin-1 receptor and, consequently, may reduce the frequency of paclitaxel-induced HSR. While aprepitant has a prophylactic effect against vomiting caused by high-dose cisplatin, the benefits of aprepitant have not been clearly demonstrated in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) combination chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study in Japanese patients with gynecologic cancer who received TC combination chemotherapy. Patients received aprepitant or placebo together with both a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone prior to chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HSR, and the secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with “no vomiting”, “no significant nausea”, and complete response, respectively. Results: Of the 324 randomized patients, 297 (151 in the aprepitant group; 146 in the placebo group) were evaluated. The percentage of patients with HSR (9.2 vs. 7.5 %, respectively; P = 0.339) was not significantly different between the groups. The percentage of “no vomiting” patients (78.2 vs. 54.8 %; P < 0.0001), “no significant nausea” patients (85.4 vs. 74.7 %; P = 0.014), and patients showing complete response (61.6 vs. 47.3 %, P = 0.0073) was significantly higher in the aprepitant group than in the placebo group. Conclusion: The administration of aprepitant did not have a prophylactic effect on the HSR but was effective in reducing nausea and vomiting in gynecologic cancer patients receiving TC combination chemotherapy.
AB - Background: Substance P contributes to the hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) to paclitaxel in a rat model. Aprepitant acts as an inhibitor of the binding of substance P to the neurokinin-1 receptor and, consequently, may reduce the frequency of paclitaxel-induced HSR. While aprepitant has a prophylactic effect against vomiting caused by high-dose cisplatin, the benefits of aprepitant have not been clearly demonstrated in patients receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) combination chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study in Japanese patients with gynecologic cancer who received TC combination chemotherapy. Patients received aprepitant or placebo together with both a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone prior to chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HSR, and the secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with “no vomiting”, “no significant nausea”, and complete response, respectively. Results: Of the 324 randomized patients, 297 (151 in the aprepitant group; 146 in the placebo group) were evaluated. The percentage of patients with HSR (9.2 vs. 7.5 %, respectively; P = 0.339) was not significantly different between the groups. The percentage of “no vomiting” patients (78.2 vs. 54.8 %; P < 0.0001), “no significant nausea” patients (85.4 vs. 74.7 %; P = 0.014), and patients showing complete response (61.6 vs. 47.3 %, P = 0.0073) was significantly higher in the aprepitant group than in the placebo group. Conclusion: The administration of aprepitant did not have a prophylactic effect on the HSR but was effective in reducing nausea and vomiting in gynecologic cancer patients receiving TC combination chemotherapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949555638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949555638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10147-015-0928-y
DO - 10.1007/s10147-015-0928-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 26662632
AN - SCOPUS:84949555638
SN - 1341-9625
VL - 21
SP - 491
EP - 497
JO - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -