TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of sorafenib for advanced renal cell carcinoma
T2 - Real-world data of patients with renal impairment
AU - Tatsugami, Katsunori
AU - Oya, Mototsugu
AU - Kabu, Koki
AU - Akaza, Hideyuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Tatsugami et al.
PY - 2018/4/10
Y1 - 2018/4/10
N2 - Background: We retrospectively analysed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with renal impairment. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) cut-off of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Background factors considered to affect prognosis were well balanced by propensity score matching between the groups. Demographics, dose modification, adverse events, tumour response, progression-free survival, and renal function (eGFR) were evaluated. Results: Among 935 and 2008 patients with an eGFR of < 45 and ≥45, respectively, 613 pairs were matched. The mean starting dose was significantly lower in patients with an eGFR of < 45; however, the mean daily dose, median treatment duration, progression-free survival, and tumour response were similar between the groups. In terms of safety, no significant differences were found in serious adverse events, although cytopaenia (16.6% vs 10.6%) and renal dysfunction (4.4% vs 0.7%) were higher in patients with an eGFR of < 45 than ≥45 in all adverse events. There were also no differences in dose modification, including dose reduction, dose interruption, and treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: Throughout the 12-month observation period, sorafenib in patients with an eGFR of < 45 and ≥45 showed similar safety and efficacy, and treatment was continued without affecting renal function.
AB - Background: We retrospectively analysed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with renal impairment. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) cut-off of 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Background factors considered to affect prognosis were well balanced by propensity score matching between the groups. Demographics, dose modification, adverse events, tumour response, progression-free survival, and renal function (eGFR) were evaluated. Results: Among 935 and 2008 patients with an eGFR of < 45 and ≥45, respectively, 613 pairs were matched. The mean starting dose was significantly lower in patients with an eGFR of < 45; however, the mean daily dose, median treatment duration, progression-free survival, and tumour response were similar between the groups. In terms of safety, no significant differences were found in serious adverse events, although cytopaenia (16.6% vs 10.6%) and renal dysfunction (4.4% vs 0.7%) were higher in patients with an eGFR of < 45 than ≥45 in all adverse events. There were also no differences in dose modification, including dose reduction, dose interruption, and treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: Throughout the 12-month observation period, sorafenib in patients with an eGFR of < 45 and ≥45 showed similar safety and efficacy, and treatment was continued without affecting renal function.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045200121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045200121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18632/oncotarget.24779
DO - 10.18632/oncotarget.24779
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85045200121
SN - 1949-2553
VL - 9
SP - 19406
EP - 19414
JO - Oncotarget
JF - Oncotarget
IS - 27
ER -