TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy analysis of the aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis for non-round cell soft-tissue sarcoma patients received adriamycin and ifosfamide therapy
AU - Kusaba, Hitoshi
AU - Kumagai, Hozumi
AU - Inadomi, Kyoko
AU - Matsunobu, Tomoya
AU - Harimaya, Katsumi
AU - Takayoshi, Kotoe
AU - Arita, Shuji
AU - Ariyama, Hiroshi
AU - Akashi, Koichi
AU - Baba, Eishi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 the Author(s).
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) therapy. Forty NRC-STS patients were enrolled, their median age was 50 years (range 18-74), and 13 (32.5%) were female. Median cycle number of AI therapy was 4. Twenty patients received the doublet antiemetic prophylaxis (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone), and 20 received triplet (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant). In the overall period, complete response rate for nausea and emesis in the triplet group was significantly higher than that in the doublet group (70% vs 35%; P=0.027). Patients with noemesis in the overall period were more frequently observed in the triplet group than in the doublet group (90% vs 65%; P=0.058). All toxicities other than emesis were almost equivalent in both the groups. These results suggest that a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis may be optimal in the treatment with AI therapy for NRC-STS.
AB - Appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in patients with non-round cell soft-tissue sarcomas (NRC-STS) remains unclear. We retrospectively investigated efficacy and safety of aprepitant-combined antiemetic prophylaxis in patients with NRC-STS receiving adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) therapy. Forty NRC-STS patients were enrolled, their median age was 50 years (range 18-74), and 13 (32.5%) were female. Median cycle number of AI therapy was 4. Twenty patients received the doublet antiemetic prophylaxis (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone), and 20 received triplet (5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and aprepitant). In the overall period, complete response rate for nausea and emesis in the triplet group was significantly higher than that in the doublet group (70% vs 35%; P=0.027). Patients with noemesis in the overall period were more frequently observed in the triplet group than in the doublet group (90% vs 65%; P=0.058). All toxicities other than emesis were almost equivalent in both the groups. These results suggest that a triplet antiemetic prophylaxis may be optimal in the treatment with AI therapy for NRC-STS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007505022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007505022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MD.0000000000005460
DO - 10.1097/MD.0000000000005460
M3 - Article
C2 - 27930525
AN - SCOPUS:85007505022
SN - 0025-7974
VL - 95
SP - e5460
JO - Medicine (United States)
JF - Medicine (United States)
IS - 49
ER -