TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of temperature and stress ratio on stage II fatigue crack propagation in bimodal Ti-6Al-4V
AU - Anne, Bhargavi Rani
AU - Tanaka, Masaki
AU - Yamasaki, Shigeto
AU - Morikawa, Tatsuya
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (JSPS KAKENHI: JP19H02462) and the Elements Strategy Initiative for Structural Materials (ESISM) of MEXT (grant number JPMXP0112101000).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Japan Institute of Metals and Materials
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - The temperature dependence of the fatigue crack propagation rate in stage IIb in bimodal Ti-6Al-4V was investigated at different stress ratios R. Fatigue tests were conducted between room temperature and 550 K at R of 0.1, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9, and two phenomena were elucidated consequently. First, the fatigue crack growth rates were nearly temperature independent for R = 0.1, 0.7, and 0.8 while it is temperature dependent at R = 0.9. This difference in the temperature dependence can be explained by the assumptions that the fatigue crack growth is controlled by the dislocation activities associated with work-hardening for R ¯ 0.8 while it is controlled by dislocation glide at R = 0.9. Second, the fatigue crack growth rates at R = 0.9 was higher than those at R = 0.1, 0.7, and 0.8. This increase in the fatigue crack growth rate at R = 0.9 can be explained by the change in the stress intensity factor of crack opening. Both the controlling mechanisms emanated from the change in the dislocation structure in front of the crack tip.
AB - The temperature dependence of the fatigue crack propagation rate in stage IIb in bimodal Ti-6Al-4V was investigated at different stress ratios R. Fatigue tests were conducted between room temperature and 550 K at R of 0.1, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9, and two phenomena were elucidated consequently. First, the fatigue crack growth rates were nearly temperature independent for R = 0.1, 0.7, and 0.8 while it is temperature dependent at R = 0.9. This difference in the temperature dependence can be explained by the assumptions that the fatigue crack growth is controlled by the dislocation activities associated with work-hardening for R ¯ 0.8 while it is controlled by dislocation glide at R = 0.9. Second, the fatigue crack growth rates at R = 0.9 was higher than those at R = 0.1, 0.7, and 0.8. This increase in the fatigue crack growth rate at R = 0.9 can be explained by the change in the stress intensity factor of crack opening. Both the controlling mechanisms emanated from the change in the dislocation structure in front of the crack tip.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108894698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108894698&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2320/matertrans.MT-M2020399
DO - 10.2320/matertrans.MT-M2020399
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85108894698
SN - 1345-9678
VL - 62
SP - 968
EP - 974
JO - Materials Transactions
JF - Materials Transactions
IS - 7
ER -