TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of intensive glycemic control on clinical outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes with different levels of cardiovascular risk and hemoglobin A1c in the ADVANCE trial
AU - Tian, Jingyan
AU - Ohkuma, Toshiaki
AU - Cooper, Mark
AU - Harrap, Stephen
AU - Mancia, Giuseppe
AU - Poulter, Neil
AU - Wang, Ji Guang
AU - Zoungas, Sophia
AU - Woodward, Mark
AU - Chalmers, John
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments. The authors thank the other investigators, staff, and participants of the ADVANCE study for their contributions. The authors also thank Chao Xia of The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, for the contribution in converting Figs. 1, 2, and 3 to the TIF format. Funding. The ADVANCE trial was funded by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia and Servier International. J.T. is supported by Shanghai Pujiang Talents Program (18PJ1407200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81270935). T.O. is supported by the John Chalm-ers Clinical Research Fellowship of The George Institute for Global Health. M.W. is supported by an NHMRC fellowship (APP108026) and Program Grant (APP1149987). Duality of Interest. M.C. reports research support from NHMRC and honoraria for advisory boards or speaking at scientific meetings from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Reata Pharmaceuticals Inc., Sanofi, and Servier International. S.H. reports honoraria from Servier International for speaking at scientific meetings. G.M. reports honoraria for participation in national or international meetings as chairman/ lecturer from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Ferrer Pharma, Medtronic, Menarini Group, Merck, Novartis, Recordati S.p.A., Sanofi, and Servier International. N.P. reports grant support from Servier International and Pfizer and honoraria and personal fees from Servier International, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Menarini Group, and Pfizer. J.-G.W. reports lecture and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Omron Corporation,SalubrisBiotherapeutics,Inc.,Servier International, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company. S.Z. reports past participation in advisory boards and/or receiving honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, Servier International, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company. M.W. reports consultancy fees from Amgen and Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. J.C. reports research grants from NHMRC and Servier International for the ADVANCE trial and ADVANCE-ON posttrial follow-up study, honoraria from Servier International for speaking at scientific meetings, and a research grant from Idorsia for the Survey of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Hypertension (SPIRIT) study. Author Contributions. J.T., T.O., and M.W. contributed to the statistical analysis. J.T. wrote the manuscript. J.-G.W. and S.Z. contributed to the discussion of the project. M.W. and J.C. contributed to the study design. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. M.W. and J.C. are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the American Diabetes Association.
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - OBJECTIVE To study whether the effects of intensive glycemic control on major vascular outcomes (a composite of major macrovascular and major microvascular events), all-cause mortality, and severe hypoglycemia events differ among participants with different levels of 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)atbaseline. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied the effects of more intensive glycemic control in 11,071 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), without missing values, in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial, using Cox models. RESULTS During 5 years’ follow-up, intensive glycemic control reduced major vascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90 [95% CI 0.83–0.98]), with the major driver being a reduction in the development of macroalbuminuria. There was no evidence of differences in the effect, regardless of baseline ASCVD risk or HbA1c level (P for interaction 5 0.29 and 0.94, respectively). Similarly, the beneficial effects of intensive glycemic control on all-cause mortality were not significantly different across baseline ASCVD risk (P 5 0.15) or HbA1c levels (P 5 0.87). The risks of severe hypoglycemic events were higher in the intensive glycemic control group compared with the standard glycemic control group (HR 1.85 [1.41–2.42]), with no significant heterogeneity across subgroups defined by ASCVD risk or HbA1c at baseline (P 5 0.09 and 0.18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The major benefits for patients with T2D in ADVANCE did not substantially differ across levels of baseline ASCVD risk and HbA1c.
AB - OBJECTIVE To study whether the effects of intensive glycemic control on major vascular outcomes (a composite of major macrovascular and major microvascular events), all-cause mortality, and severe hypoglycemia events differ among participants with different levels of 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)atbaseline. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied the effects of more intensive glycemic control in 11,071 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), without missing values, in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial, using Cox models. RESULTS During 5 years’ follow-up, intensive glycemic control reduced major vascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90 [95% CI 0.83–0.98]), with the major driver being a reduction in the development of macroalbuminuria. There was no evidence of differences in the effect, regardless of baseline ASCVD risk or HbA1c level (P for interaction 5 0.29 and 0.94, respectively). Similarly, the beneficial effects of intensive glycemic control on all-cause mortality were not significantly different across baseline ASCVD risk (P 5 0.15) or HbA1c levels (P 5 0.87). The risks of severe hypoglycemic events were higher in the intensive glycemic control group compared with the standard glycemic control group (HR 1.85 [1.41–2.42]), with no significant heterogeneity across subgroups defined by ASCVD risk or HbA1c at baseline (P 5 0.09 and 0.18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The major benefits for patients with T2D in ADVANCE did not substantially differ across levels of baseline ASCVD risk and HbA1c.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085263559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085263559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2337/dc19-1817
DO - 10.2337/dc19-1817
M3 - Article
C2 - 32193249
AN - SCOPUS:85085263559
SN - 0149-5992
VL - 43
SP - 1293
EP - 1299
JO - Diabetes care
JF - Diabetes care
IS - 6
ER -