TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of iodine concentration and body size on iodine subtraction in virtual non-contrast imaging
T2 - A phantom study
AU - Shirasaka, T.
AU - Kojima, T.
AU - Yamane, S.
AU - Mikayama, R.
AU - Kawakubo, M.
AU - Funatsu, R.
AU - Kato, T.
AU - Ishigami, K.
AU - Funama, Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The College of Radiographers
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Introduction: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can generate virtual non-contrast (VNC) images. Herein, we sought to improve the accuracy of VNC images by identifying the optimal slope of contrast media (SCM) for VNC-image generation based on the iodine concentration and subject's body size. Methods: We used DECT to scan a multi-energy phantom including four iodine concentration rods (15, 10, 5, and 2 mg/mL), and 240 VNC images (eight SCM ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 × three body sizes × ten scans) that were generated by three-material decomposition. The CT number of each iodine and solid water rod part was measured in each VNC image. The difference in the CT number between the iodine and the solid water rod part was calculated and compared using paired t-test or repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The SCM that achieved an absolute value of the difference in CT number of <5.0 Hounsfield units (HU) for all body sizes simultaneously was greater at lower iodine concentration (SCM of 0.5, 0.51, and 0.53 at 10, 5, and 2 mg/mL iodine, respectively). At an iodine concentration of 15 mg/mL, no SCM achieved an absolute difference of <5.0 HU in CT number for all body sizes simultaneously. At all iodine concentrations, the SCM achieving the minimal difference in the CT number increased with the increase in body size. Conclusion: By adjusting the SCM according to the iodine concentration and body size, it is possible to generate VNC images with an accuracy of <5.0 HU. Implications for practice: Improving the accuracy of VNC images minimizing incomplete iodine subtraction would make it possible to replace true non-contrast (TNC) images with VNC images and reduce the radiation dose.
AB - Introduction: Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can generate virtual non-contrast (VNC) images. Herein, we sought to improve the accuracy of VNC images by identifying the optimal slope of contrast media (SCM) for VNC-image generation based on the iodine concentration and subject's body size. Methods: We used DECT to scan a multi-energy phantom including four iodine concentration rods (15, 10, 5, and 2 mg/mL), and 240 VNC images (eight SCM ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 × three body sizes × ten scans) that were generated by three-material decomposition. The CT number of each iodine and solid water rod part was measured in each VNC image. The difference in the CT number between the iodine and the solid water rod part was calculated and compared using paired t-test or repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The SCM that achieved an absolute value of the difference in CT number of <5.0 Hounsfield units (HU) for all body sizes simultaneously was greater at lower iodine concentration (SCM of 0.5, 0.51, and 0.53 at 10, 5, and 2 mg/mL iodine, respectively). At an iodine concentration of 15 mg/mL, no SCM achieved an absolute difference of <5.0 HU in CT number for all body sizes simultaneously. At all iodine concentrations, the SCM achieving the minimal difference in the CT number increased with the increase in body size. Conclusion: By adjusting the SCM according to the iodine concentration and body size, it is possible to generate VNC images with an accuracy of <5.0 HU. Implications for practice: Improving the accuracy of VNC images minimizing incomplete iodine subtraction would make it possible to replace true non-contrast (TNC) images with VNC images and reduce the radiation dose.
KW - Body size
KW - Dual-energy computed tomography
KW - Iodine concentration
KW - Iodine subtraction
KW - Virtual non-contrast
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150829680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85150829680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radi.2023.03.003
DO - 10.1016/j.radi.2023.03.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 36965243
AN - SCOPUS:85150829680
SN - 1078-8174
VL - 29
SP - 557
EP - 563
JO - Radiography
JF - Radiography
IS - 3
ER -