TY - JOUR
T1 - Does apparent diffusion coefficient predict the degree of liver regeneration of donor and recipient after living donor liver transplantation?
AU - Morita, Koichiro
AU - Nishie, Akihiro
AU - Asayama, Yoshiki
AU - Ishigami, Kousei
AU - Ushijima, Yasuhiro
AU - Takayama, Yukihisa
AU - Okamoto, Daisuke
AU - Fujita, Nobuhiro
AU - Ikegami, Toru
AU - Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
AU - Shirabe, Ken
AU - Honda, Hiroshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Objective To elucidate the relationship between the ADCs of the liver graft and the remnant liver and the degree of liver regeneration in LDLT. Materials and methods 15 recipients and 15 corresponding donors underwent magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography 1–2 weeks after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). For diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), a single-shot echo-planar sequence with b-factors of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2 was scanned. ADCs of the liver parenchyma were calculated at b factors of 0 and 500 and 1000 (ADC 0–500–1000) or 0 and 500 (ADC 0–500) or 500 and 1000 (ADC 500–1000). The liver volume ratio at LDLT, the mean ADCs and the regeneration rate were compared between the graft and the remnant liver using paired-t tests. Results The mean liver volume ratio of the recipients (41.3 ± 9.8%) tended to be smaller than that of the donors (51.8 ± 13.8%). The mean ADC 0–500 of the remnant liver (1.72 ± 0.33) was significantly higher than that of the graft (1.43 ± 0.32). The regeneration rate of the graft (2.07 ± 0.41) was significantly higher than that of the remnant liver (1.53 ± 0.49). Conclusion ADC 0–500 can describe differences in blood perfusion between liver grafts and the remnant liver according to the degree of liver regeneration.
AB - Objective To elucidate the relationship between the ADCs of the liver graft and the remnant liver and the degree of liver regeneration in LDLT. Materials and methods 15 recipients and 15 corresponding donors underwent magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography 1–2 weeks after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). For diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), a single-shot echo-planar sequence with b-factors of 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2 was scanned. ADCs of the liver parenchyma were calculated at b factors of 0 and 500 and 1000 (ADC 0–500–1000) or 0 and 500 (ADC 0–500) or 500 and 1000 (ADC 500–1000). The liver volume ratio at LDLT, the mean ADCs and the regeneration rate were compared between the graft and the remnant liver using paired-t tests. Results The mean liver volume ratio of the recipients (41.3 ± 9.8%) tended to be smaller than that of the donors (51.8 ± 13.8%). The mean ADC 0–500 of the remnant liver (1.72 ± 0.33) was significantly higher than that of the graft (1.43 ± 0.32). The regeneration rate of the graft (2.07 ± 0.41) was significantly higher than that of the remnant liver (1.53 ± 0.49). Conclusion ADC 0–500 can describe differences in blood perfusion between liver grafts and the remnant liver according to the degree of liver regeneration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014768255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014768255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.041
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.041
M3 - Article
C2 - 28583626
AN - SCOPUS:85014768255
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 90
SP - 146
EP - 151
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
ER -