TY - JOUR
T1 - Different therapeutic mechanisms of rigid and semi-rigid mandibular repositioning devices in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
AU - Suga, Hokuto
AU - Mishima, Katsuaki
AU - Nakano, Hiroyuki
AU - Nakano, Asuka
AU - Matsumura, Mayumi
AU - Mano, Takamitsu
AU - Yamasaki, Youichi
AU - Ueyama, Yoshiya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rightsreserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - To clarify the mechanisms of rigid and semi-rigid mandibular repositioning devices (MRDs) in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), seven and 13 patients received rigid and semi-rigid MRDs, respectively. Each patient underwent polysomnographic and computed tomographic examinations at the initial consultation and after symptom improvement. Three-dimensional models of the upper airway (hard palate level to epiglottic base) were reconstructed by image processing software (Mimics version 14.2) to measure airway morphology. The mean age and body mass index were 58.1 years and 24.8 kg/m2, respectively, in the rigid MRD group and 57.9 years and 23.2 kg/m2, respectively, in the semi-rigid MRD group. The apnea-hypopnea index significantly improved (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) from 22.0 to 8.9 and 20.5 to 11.5 events per hour of sleep in the respective groups. The cross-sectional areas measured at the epiglottic tip (from 2.0 to 2.6 cm2) and hard palate (from 2.6 to 3.3 cm2) levels also increased in the respective groups (P < 0.05). However, airway volume, cross-sectional area measured at the uvular tip level, and anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the airway were not significantly different. In conclusion, both types of MRDs improve respiratory status, but they affect different parts of the airway.
AB - To clarify the mechanisms of rigid and semi-rigid mandibular repositioning devices (MRDs) in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), seven and 13 patients received rigid and semi-rigid MRDs, respectively. Each patient underwent polysomnographic and computed tomographic examinations at the initial consultation and after symptom improvement. Three-dimensional models of the upper airway (hard palate level to epiglottic base) were reconstructed by image processing software (Mimics version 14.2) to measure airway morphology. The mean age and body mass index were 58.1 years and 24.8 kg/m2, respectively, in the rigid MRD group and 57.9 years and 23.2 kg/m2, respectively, in the semi-rigid MRD group. The apnea-hypopnea index significantly improved (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) from 22.0 to 8.9 and 20.5 to 11.5 events per hour of sleep in the respective groups. The cross-sectional areas measured at the epiglottic tip (from 2.0 to 2.6 cm2) and hard palate (from 2.6 to 3.3 cm2) levels also increased in the respective groups (P < 0.05). However, airway volume, cross-sectional area measured at the uvular tip level, and anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the airway were not significantly different. In conclusion, both types of MRDs improve respiratory status, but they affect different parts of the airway.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919840110&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919840110&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.05.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.05.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 24969766
AN - SCOPUS:84919840110
SN - 1010-5182
VL - 42
SP - 1650
EP - 1654
JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 8
ER -