Abstract
Background/Aims: As different features of colorectal cancer between proximal and distal sites are influenced mainly by proximal shift and diagnostic improvement, a comparison of proximal and distal cancer sites may provide clues as to appropriate strategy for colorectal cancer treatment. Methodology: The clinicopatholpogical data on 676 patients with colorectal cancer was compared regarding the proximal and distal sites. Results: In cases of cancer without metastasis (Dukes' A or B), the incidence of Dukes' A was higher in the distal than in the proximal site (11.2%) vs. 24.3%), while the incidence of Duke's B was lower in the distal than the proximal site. In cases of cancer with metastasis (Duke's C or D), the incidence of Dukes' C and Dukes' D tumors was similar between proximal and distal sites. Conclusions: A large number of Dukes' A cancer in distal site may be slow growing with low metastatic potential.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1535-1537 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Hepato-gastroenterology |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 48 |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Hepatology
- Gastroenterology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Different distribution of Dukes' stage between proximal and distal colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS