TY - JOUR
T1 - Deformation of a nanocube with a single incoherent precipitate
T2 - role of precipitate size and dislocation looping
AU - Kiani, Mehrdad T.
AU - Murayama, Mitsuhiro
AU - Gu, X. Wendy
N1 - Funding Information:
MTK is supported by the National Defense and Science Engineering Graduate Fellowship. XWG acknowledges financial support from Stanford start-up funds. MM acknowledges thanks the Virginia Tech National Center for Earth and Environmental Nanotechnology Infrastructure (NanoEarth), a member of the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI), supported by National Science Foundation (ECCS 1542100) for providing technical consultation. Facilities were made available through Virginia Tech's Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science Nanoscale Characterization and Fabrication Laboratory (ICTAS-NCFL). Part of this work was performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF), which is supported by the National Science Foundation under award ECCS-1542152.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/7/2
Y1 - 2020/7/2
N2 - Precipitate hardening is a key strengthening mechanism in metallic alloys. Classical models for precipitate hardening are based on the average behaviour of an ensemble of precipitates, and fail to capture the complexity of dislocation-precipitate interactions that have recently been observed at individual precipitates in simulations and in-situ electron microscopy. In order to achieve tailored mechanical properties, detailed deformation mechanisms at specific precipitates that account for precipitate size, crystallography, and defect structure must be understood, but has been challenging to achieve experimentally. Here, in-situ scanning electron microscope mechanical testing is used to obtain the compressive stress–strain behaviour at an individual, incoherent Au precipitate within a Cu nanocube, and determine the influence of precipitate and cube size on yield strength and strain hardening. TEM imaging and strain mapping of the initial structure shows misfit dislocations at the Au precipitate, threading dislocations that traverse the Cu shell, and localised and anisotropic strain near the precipitate and threading dislocation. These nanocubes have yield strengths of 800–1000 MPa and strain hardening rate of 1–4 GPa. Yield strength is found to depend on the distance from the precipitate interface to the cube edge, while strain hardening depends on both cube size and precipitate size. An analytical model is developed to quantify the contribution of Orowan looping, Orowan stress, back stress and image stress to plasticity at the Au precipitate. Orowan stress is found to be the largest contributor, followed by back stress and image stress.
AB - Precipitate hardening is a key strengthening mechanism in metallic alloys. Classical models for precipitate hardening are based on the average behaviour of an ensemble of precipitates, and fail to capture the complexity of dislocation-precipitate interactions that have recently been observed at individual precipitates in simulations and in-situ electron microscopy. In order to achieve tailored mechanical properties, detailed deformation mechanisms at specific precipitates that account for precipitate size, crystallography, and defect structure must be understood, but has been challenging to achieve experimentally. Here, in-situ scanning electron microscope mechanical testing is used to obtain the compressive stress–strain behaviour at an individual, incoherent Au precipitate within a Cu nanocube, and determine the influence of precipitate and cube size on yield strength and strain hardening. TEM imaging and strain mapping of the initial structure shows misfit dislocations at the Au precipitate, threading dislocations that traverse the Cu shell, and localised and anisotropic strain near the precipitate and threading dislocation. These nanocubes have yield strengths of 800–1000 MPa and strain hardening rate of 1–4 GPa. Yield strength is found to depend on the distance from the precipitate interface to the cube edge, while strain hardening depends on both cube size and precipitate size. An analytical model is developed to quantify the contribution of Orowan looping, Orowan stress, back stress and image stress to plasticity at the Au precipitate. Orowan stress is found to be the largest contributor, followed by back stress and image stress.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082332543&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082332543&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14786435.2020.1741044
DO - 10.1080/14786435.2020.1741044
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85082332543
SN - 1478-6435
VL - 100
SP - 1749
EP - 1770
JO - Philosophical Magazine
JF - Philosophical Magazine
IS - 13
ER -