DC-bias-voltage dependence of degradation of aluminum electrolytic capacitors

K. Hasegawa, K. Tsuzaki, S. Nishizawa

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Attention has been paid to reliability-related issues for dc-link capacitors such as monitoring methods, power-loss estimation, and ageing tests. The degradation of the capacitors depends on their operating condition including temperature, ripple current, and dc-bias voltage, which has a strong influence on failures as well. In design stages of power converters, it is desirable to know the relation between the degradation and electrolytic parameters. This paper makes an intensive discussion on the voltage dependence of the degradation of a small aluminum electrolytic capacitor with an ageing test and a leakage-current measurement. The ageing test reveals that a higher dc-bias voltage brings a faster increase in ESR but results in a slower drop in capacitance in a range within the rated voltage. This result implies that either capacitance or ESR cannot be a unique indicator of the lifetime. Attention should be paid both to the ESR and to the capacitance when one monitors the capacitor condition. On the other hand, more than the rated voltage leads a rapid degradation of the capacitor, which can be confirmed by a leakage-current measurement instead of the ageing test.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)115-118
    Number of pages4
    JournalMicroelectronics Reliability
    Volume83
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
    • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
    • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
    • Condensed Matter Physics
    • Surfaces, Coatings and Films
    • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'DC-bias-voltage dependence of degradation of aluminum electrolytic capacitors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this