TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-correlation Quantification of Dyssynchrony
T2 - A New Method for Quantifying the Synchrony of Contraction and Relaxation in the Heart
AU - Fornwalt, Brandon K.
AU - Arita, Takeshi
AU - Bhasin, Mohit
AU - Voulgaris, George
AU - Merlino, John D.
AU - León, Angel R.
AU - Fyfe, Derek A.
AU - Oshinski, John N.
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - Background: Quantification of left ventricular dyssynchrony using Doppler tissue imaging may improve selection of patients who will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy. Most methods used to quantify dyssynchrony use a time-to-peak analysis, which is quantitatively simplistic and requires manual identification of systole and selection of peak velocities. Methods: We developed and tested a new, highly automatable dyssynchrony parameter, cross-correlation delay (XCD), that does not require identification of systole or manual selection of peak systolic velocities. XCD uses all velocity data points from 3 consecutive beats (∼420 points). We tested XCD on 11 members of a positive control group (responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume) and 12 members of a negative control group (normal 12-lead electrocardiogram and 2-dimensional echocardiogram findings). We compared XCD to septal-to-lateral delay in time-to-peak (SLD), maximum difference in the basal 2- or 4-chamber times to peak (MaxDiff), and SD of the 12 basal and midwall times-to-peak (Ts-SD). Results: XCD and Ts-SD were significantly different between the positive and negative control groups (both P ≤ .0001). SLD and MaxDiff demonstrated no difference between the positive and negative control groups. XCD and Ts-SD were superior to SLD and MaxDiff in discriminating between positive and negative control groups (both P < .01 by receiver operating characteristic comparison). XCD, SLD, MaxDiff, and Ts-SD demonstrated dyssynchrony in 0%, 50%, 58%, and 50% of the negative control group, respectively. XCD was the only parameter that decreased after resynchronization in the positive control group (from 160 ± 88-69 ± 61 milliseconds, P = .003). Conclusion: XCD is superior to existing parameters at discriminating patients with left ventricular dyssynchrony from those with normal function.
AB - Background: Quantification of left ventricular dyssynchrony using Doppler tissue imaging may improve selection of patients who will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy. Most methods used to quantify dyssynchrony use a time-to-peak analysis, which is quantitatively simplistic and requires manual identification of systole and selection of peak velocities. Methods: We developed and tested a new, highly automatable dyssynchrony parameter, cross-correlation delay (XCD), that does not require identification of systole or manual selection of peak systolic velocities. XCD uses all velocity data points from 3 consecutive beats (∼420 points). We tested XCD on 11 members of a positive control group (responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy with a ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume) and 12 members of a negative control group (normal 12-lead electrocardiogram and 2-dimensional echocardiogram findings). We compared XCD to septal-to-lateral delay in time-to-peak (SLD), maximum difference in the basal 2- or 4-chamber times to peak (MaxDiff), and SD of the 12 basal and midwall times-to-peak (Ts-SD). Results: XCD and Ts-SD were significantly different between the positive and negative control groups (both P ≤ .0001). SLD and MaxDiff demonstrated no difference between the positive and negative control groups. XCD and Ts-SD were superior to SLD and MaxDiff in discriminating between positive and negative control groups (both P < .01 by receiver operating characteristic comparison). XCD, SLD, MaxDiff, and Ts-SD demonstrated dyssynchrony in 0%, 50%, 58%, and 50% of the negative control group, respectively. XCD was the only parameter that decreased after resynchronization in the positive control group (from 160 ± 88-69 ± 61 milliseconds, P = .003). Conclusion: XCD is superior to existing parameters at discriminating patients with left ventricular dyssynchrony from those with normal function.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36549034267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36549034267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2007.04.030
DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2007.04.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 17643956
AN - SCOPUS:36549034267
SN - 0894-7317
VL - 20
SP - 1330-1337.e1
JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
IS - 12
ER -