TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-continental comparison of safety and protection measures amongst urologists during COVID-19
AU - the Société Internationale d’Urologie Board of Directors
AU - de la Rosette, Jean
AU - Laguna, Pilar
AU - Álvarez-Maestro, Mario
AU - Eto, Masatoshi
AU - Mochtar, Chaidir Arif
AU - Albayrak, Selami
AU - Mendoza-Valdes, Arturo
AU - Ong, Teng Aik
AU - Khadgi, Sanjay
AU - Al-Terki, Abdullatif
AU - Bolton, Damien
AU - Gomez, Reynaldo
AU - Klotz, Laurence
AU - Kulkarni, Sanjay
AU - Tanguay, Simon
AU - Gravas, Stavros
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge support from the SIU Central Office, including Merveille de Souza, Carrie Thompson, Melissa St‐Onge, Susie Petrusa and Christine Albino, the contributions of Darcy Lewis and Alison Palkhivala for medical writing and editorial support, and Michael Barlev for statistical support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Japanese Urological Association
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Objectives: To determine the well-being of urologists worldwide during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, and whether they have adequate personal protective equipment knowledge and supplies appropriate to their clinical setting. Methods: Urologists worldwide completed a Société Internationale d’Urologie online survey from 16 April 2020 until 1 May 2020. Analysis was carried out to evaluate their knowledge about protecting themselves and others in the workplace, including their confidence in their ability to remain safe at work, and any regional differences. Results: There were 3488 respondents from 109 countries. Urologists who stated they were moderately comfortable that their work environment offers good protection against coronavirus disease 2019 showed a total mean satisfaction level of 5.99 (on a “0 = not at all” to “10 = very” scale). A large majority (86.33%) were confident about protecting themselves from coronavirus disease 2019 at work. However, only about one-third reported their institution provided the required personal protective equipment (35.78%), and nearly half indicated their hospital has or had limited personal protective equipment availability (48.08%). Worldwide, a large majority of respondents answered affirmatively for testing the healthcare team (83.09%). Approximately half of the respondents (52.85%) across all regions indicated that all surgical team members face an equal risk of contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (52.85%). Nearly one-third of respondents reported that they had experienced social avoidance (28.97%). Conclusions: Our results show that urologists lack up-to-date knowledge of preferred protocols for personal protective equipment selection and use, social distancing, and coronavirus disease 2019 testing. These data can provide insights into functional domains from which other specialties could also benefit.
AB - Objectives: To determine the well-being of urologists worldwide during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, and whether they have adequate personal protective equipment knowledge and supplies appropriate to their clinical setting. Methods: Urologists worldwide completed a Société Internationale d’Urologie online survey from 16 April 2020 until 1 May 2020. Analysis was carried out to evaluate their knowledge about protecting themselves and others in the workplace, including their confidence in their ability to remain safe at work, and any regional differences. Results: There were 3488 respondents from 109 countries. Urologists who stated they were moderately comfortable that their work environment offers good protection against coronavirus disease 2019 showed a total mean satisfaction level of 5.99 (on a “0 = not at all” to “10 = very” scale). A large majority (86.33%) were confident about protecting themselves from coronavirus disease 2019 at work. However, only about one-third reported their institution provided the required personal protective equipment (35.78%), and nearly half indicated their hospital has or had limited personal protective equipment availability (48.08%). Worldwide, a large majority of respondents answered affirmatively for testing the healthcare team (83.09%). Approximately half of the respondents (52.85%) across all regions indicated that all surgical team members face an equal risk of contracting coronavirus disease 2019 (52.85%). Nearly one-third of respondents reported that they had experienced social avoidance (28.97%). Conclusions: Our results show that urologists lack up-to-date knowledge of preferred protocols for personal protective equipment selection and use, social distancing, and coronavirus disease 2019 testing. These data can provide insights into functional domains from which other specialties could also benefit.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089068660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089068660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/iju.14340
DO - 10.1111/iju.14340
M3 - Article
C2 - 32772434
AN - SCOPUS:85089068660
SN - 0919-8172
VL - 27
SP - 981
EP - 989
JO - International Journal of Urology
JF - International Journal of Urology
IS - 11
ER -