TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum
T2 - “Attribution of the June-July 2013 Heat Wave in the Southwestern United States”
AU - Shiogama, Hideo
AU - Watanabe, Masahiro
AU - Imada, Yukiko
AU - Mori, Masato
AU - Kamae, Youichi
AU - Ishii, Masayoshi
AU - Kimoto, Masahide
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Oliver Angélil who found the errors in the GHGs concentrations. This work was supported by the Program for Risk Information on Climate Change (SOUSEI program), Grant-in-Aid Change 26281013 and Grant-in-Aid 26247079 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-10) of the Ministry of the Environment of Japan. The Earth Simulator and NEC SX (NIES) were utilised for the simulations.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016. the Meteorological Society of Japan
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Corrections of these errors did not change the main conclusions of S14 qualitatively. S14 underestimated the anthropogenic warming signals. The probability of a hot summer as severe as that of 2013 was 14% for ALL (Fig. 1b, the corrected version of the original Fig. 3b), but that was 2% in S14. Although S14 wrote “the observed value lays in the tail of the histogram for the ALL runs (the first paragraph of the right column of page 124)” and “Although the observed SAT anomalies in 2013 lay in the tail of the histogram for the ALL runs (the second paragraph of summary)”, the observed value is not rare (14%) in Fig. 1
AB - Corrections of these errors did not change the main conclusions of S14 qualitatively. S14 underestimated the anthropogenic warming signals. The probability of a hot summer as severe as that of 2013 was 14% for ALL (Fig. 1b, the corrected version of the original Fig. 3b), but that was 2% in S14. Although S14 wrote “the observed value lays in the tail of the histogram for the ALL runs (the first paragraph of the right column of page 124)” and “Although the observed SAT anomalies in 2013 lay in the tail of the histogram for the ALL runs (the second paragraph of summary)”, the observed value is not rare (14%) in Fig. 1
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011405236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011405236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2151/sola.2016-062
DO - 10.2151/sola.2016-062
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85011405236
SN - 1349-6476
VL - 12
SP - 3
EP - 4
JO - Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere
JF - Scientific Online Letters on the Atmosphere
ER -