TY - JOUR
T1 - Conservation Auctions and Compliance
T2 - Theory and Evidence from Laboratory Experiments
AU - Kawasaki, Kentaro
AU - Fujie, Takeshi
AU - Koito, Kentaro
AU - Inoue, Norikazu
AU - Sasaki, Hiroki
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The authors thank James Alm, Peter Cramton, Geret DePiper, Vijay Krishna, Takao Kusakawa, Andreas Lange, Satoru Shimokawa, and JunJie Wu for their helpful discussions and suggestions. Comments from Alistair Munro (Associate Editor) and two anonymous referees substantially improved the paper. Of course, all remaining errors are ours. This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C-19580271) and Environment Research & Technology Development Fund (D-0906). The views expressed are those of authors and do not reflect those of the institutions they are affiliated with.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Many agri-environmental conservation programs are faced with the problem of imperfect monitoring. This provides farmers with an incentive for noncompliance, because they can receive subsidies without implementing the conservation scheme. In this paper, bidding behavior and auction performance are compared for discriminatory-price and uniform-price auctions in an imperfect monitoring environment. Our theoretical analysis suggests that auction performances are equalized between the discriminatory-price and uniform-price auctions. However, laboratory experiments reveal that, although the discriminatory-price auction has an advantage in terms of reducing policy costs, it is more likely to cause adverse selection. As a result, the uniform-price auction tends to have higher efficiency and cost-effectiveness when compliance behavior is taken into account.
AB - Many agri-environmental conservation programs are faced with the problem of imperfect monitoring. This provides farmers with an incentive for noncompliance, because they can receive subsidies without implementing the conservation scheme. In this paper, bidding behavior and auction performance are compared for discriminatory-price and uniform-price auctions in an imperfect monitoring environment. Our theoretical analysis suggests that auction performances are equalized between the discriminatory-price and uniform-price auctions. However, laboratory experiments reveal that, although the discriminatory-price auction has an advantage in terms of reducing policy costs, it is more likely to cause adverse selection. As a result, the uniform-price auction tends to have higher efficiency and cost-effectiveness when compliance behavior is taken into account.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860741677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860741677&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10640-012-9551-9
DO - 10.1007/s10640-012-9551-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84860741677
SN - 0924-6460
VL - 52
SP - 157
EP - 179
JO - Environmental and Resource Economics
JF - Environmental and Resource Economics
IS - 2
ER -