TY - JOUR
T1 - Compressed communication complexity of hamming distance
AU - Mitsuya, Shiori
AU - Nakashima, Yuto
AU - Inenaga, Shunsuke
AU - Bannai, Hideo
AU - Takeda, Masayuki
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP18K18002 (YN), JP20H04141 (HB), JP18H04098 (MT), and JST PRESTO Grant Number JPMJPR1922 (SI).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - We consider the communication complexity of the Hamming distance of two strings. Bille et al. [SPIRE 2018] considered the communication complexity of the longest common prefix (LCP) problem in the setting where the two parties have their strings in a compressed form, i.e., represented by the Lempel-Ziv 77 factorization (LZ77) with/without self-references. We present a randomized public-coin protocol for a joint computation of the Hamming distance of two strings represented by LZ77 without self-references. Although our scheme is heavily based on Bille et al.’s LCP protocol, our complexity analysis is original which uses Crochemore’s C-factorization and Rytter’s AVL-grammar. As a byproduct, we also show that LZ77 with/without self-references are not monotonic in the sense that their sizes can increase by a factor of 4/3 when a prefix of the string is removed.
AB - We consider the communication complexity of the Hamming distance of two strings. Bille et al. [SPIRE 2018] considered the communication complexity of the longest common prefix (LCP) problem in the setting where the two parties have their strings in a compressed form, i.e., represented by the Lempel-Ziv 77 factorization (LZ77) with/without self-references. We present a randomized public-coin protocol for a joint computation of the Hamming distance of two strings represented by LZ77 without self-references. Although our scheme is heavily based on Bille et al.’s LCP protocol, our complexity analysis is original which uses Crochemore’s C-factorization and Rytter’s AVL-grammar. As a byproduct, we also show that LZ77 with/without self-references are not monotonic in the sense that their sizes can increase by a factor of 4/3 when a prefix of the string is removed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104788004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104788004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/a14040116
DO - 10.3390/a14040116
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85104788004
SN - 1999-4893
VL - 14
JO - Algorithms
JF - Algorithms
IS - 4
M1 - 116
ER -