TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative study on three different methods for arm-span measurement
T2 - The Japan environment and Children's study pilot
AU - Tsuji, Mayumi
AU - Ayabe, Tadayuki
AU - Tanaka, Rie
AU - Senju, Ayako
AU - Shibata, Eiji
AU - Araki, Shunsuke
AU - Morokuma, Seiichi
AU - Sanefuji, Masafumi
AU - Kusuhara, Koichi
AU - Kawamoto, Toshihiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s). 2017.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background: Arm span is an important measure for the assessment of growth and hormone deficiency diseases. In an epidemiological survey, with a large number of subjects' indicators, it is especially valuable to establish methods which can measure both quickly and accurately. However, there are various methods, and the length of arm span may vary according to the medical institution. Methods: The arm span of nine 6-year old subjects was measured using two institutional standard methods, A and B, and a third method C which is an improved method and has been used for the first time in this study. A, No-Wall, with heels together the child stretches the arms out to the sides. B, Wall & No-Line, the child stands against the wall with heels together and spreads the arms against the wall. C, Wall & Line, the method is the same as B except a paper with horizontal lines is placed on the wall. We measured twice by each method. Results: The difference between the 1st and 2nd measurements was marginally significantly smaller by using method of C. Conclusion: The method C, which we improved, is the best way to measure arm span.
AB - Background: Arm span is an important measure for the assessment of growth and hormone deficiency diseases. In an epidemiological survey, with a large number of subjects' indicators, it is especially valuable to establish methods which can measure both quickly and accurately. However, there are various methods, and the length of arm span may vary according to the medical institution. Methods: The arm span of nine 6-year old subjects was measured using two institutional standard methods, A and B, and a third method C which is an improved method and has been used for the first time in this study. A, No-Wall, with heels together the child stretches the arms out to the sides. B, Wall & No-Line, the child stands against the wall with heels together and spreads the arms against the wall. C, Wall & Line, the method is the same as B except a paper with horizontal lines is placed on the wall. We measured twice by each method. Results: The difference between the 1st and 2nd measurements was marginally significantly smaller by using method of C. Conclusion: The method C, which we improved, is the best way to measure arm span.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032855345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032855345&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12199-017-0632-9
DO - 10.1186/s12199-017-0632-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 29165129
AN - SCOPUS:85032855345
SN - 1342-078X
VL - 22
JO - Environmental health and preventive medicine
JF - Environmental health and preventive medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 28
ER -