TY - JOUR
T1 - Community validation of the U.K. diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis in Japanese elementary schoolchildren
AU - Saeki, Hidehisa
AU - Iizuka, Hajime
AU - Mori, Yasuki
AU - Akasaka, Toshihide
AU - Takagi, Hajime
AU - Kitajima, Yasuo
AU - Oiso, Naoki
AU - Kawada, Akira
AU - Tezuka, Tadashi
AU - Tanaka, Toshihiko
AU - Hide, Michihiro
AU - Yamamoto, Shoso
AU - Hirose, Yasuaki
AU - Kodama, Hajime
AU - Urabe, Kazunori
AU - Furue, Masutaka
AU - Kasagi, Fumiyoshi
AU - Morita, Eishin
AU - Tsunemi, Yuichiro
AU - Tamaki, Kunihiko
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Boards of Education, school principals, teachers, parents and all the schoolchildren who participated in this survey. This work was supported by Health Science Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Labor of Japan.
Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2007/9
Y1 - 2007/9
N2 - Background: A simple list of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis for use in epidemiological studies was developed by a U.K. working party. This list served well for both hospital patients with skin diseases and in general population within the U.K. Objectives: To validate the U.K. diagnostic criteria in Japanese elementary schoolchildren, we collected the questionnaires on regular health checkups, which had been completed by parents of schoolchildren in 2001/2002 and 2004/2005. Methods: Elementary schoolchildren were examined by dermatologists in eight areas (16,152 children) in 2001/2002 and in three areas (3849 children) in 2004/2005. The questionnaire was distributed to the parents 2 weeks before the skin examination, completed by the parents and collected after the survey. Results: In 2002/2002 comparing the U.K. diagnostic criteria with the findings on clinical examination used as the reference standard, the U.K. criteria (1-year prevalence measure) showed a sensitivity of 71.8%, specificity of 89.3% and positive predictive value of 44.7%. In 2004/2005 we confirmed that the U.K. criteria for a point prevalence measure showed a higher positive predictive value (59.9%) compared with that for 1-year prevalence measure (49.3%). Conclusion: Now that we know the sensitivity and specificity of the U.K. criteria in the population examined in this study, we will be able in the near future to estimate the prevalence of atopic dermatitis in a similar population with reverse operation by questionnaires alone using these criteria without examination by dermatologists. Therefore, the validation study of U.K. criteria could be useful for future epidemiologic surveys.
AB - Background: A simple list of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis for use in epidemiological studies was developed by a U.K. working party. This list served well for both hospital patients with skin diseases and in general population within the U.K. Objectives: To validate the U.K. diagnostic criteria in Japanese elementary schoolchildren, we collected the questionnaires on regular health checkups, which had been completed by parents of schoolchildren in 2001/2002 and 2004/2005. Methods: Elementary schoolchildren were examined by dermatologists in eight areas (16,152 children) in 2001/2002 and in three areas (3849 children) in 2004/2005. The questionnaire was distributed to the parents 2 weeks before the skin examination, completed by the parents and collected after the survey. Results: In 2002/2002 comparing the U.K. diagnostic criteria with the findings on clinical examination used as the reference standard, the U.K. criteria (1-year prevalence measure) showed a sensitivity of 71.8%, specificity of 89.3% and positive predictive value of 44.7%. In 2004/2005 we confirmed that the U.K. criteria for a point prevalence measure showed a higher positive predictive value (59.9%) compared with that for 1-year prevalence measure (49.3%). Conclusion: Now that we know the sensitivity and specificity of the U.K. criteria in the population examined in this study, we will be able in the near future to estimate the prevalence of atopic dermatitis in a similar population with reverse operation by questionnaires alone using these criteria without examination by dermatologists. Therefore, the validation study of U.K. criteria could be useful for future epidemiologic surveys.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447562642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447562642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.04.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.04.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 17544635
AN - SCOPUS:34447562642
SN - 0923-1811
VL - 47
SP - 227
EP - 231
JO - Journal of Dermatological Science
JF - Journal of Dermatological Science
IS - 3
ER -