Checkerboard speech vs interrupted speech: Effects of spectrotemporal segmentation on intelligibility

Kazuo Ueda, Riina Kawakami, Hiroshige Takeichi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The intelligibility of interrupted speech (interrupted over time) and checkerboard speech (interrupted over time-by-frequency), both of which retained a half of the original speech, was examined. The intelligibility of interrupted speech stimuli decreased as segment duration increased. 20-band checkerboard speech stimuli brought nearly 100% intelligibility irrespective of segment duration, whereas, with 2 and 4 frequency bands, a trough of 35%-40% appeared at the 160-ms segment duration. Mosaic speech stimuli (power was averaged over a time-frequency unit) yielded generally poor intelligibility (<= 10%). The results revealed the limitations of underlying auditory organization for speech cues scattered in a time-frequency domain.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number075204
    JournalJASA Express Letters
    Volume1
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 21 2021

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
    • Linguistics and Language
    • Sensory Systems
    • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Checkerboard speech vs interrupted speech: Effects of spectrotemporal segmentation on intelligibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this