TY - JOUR
T1 - Cerebrospinal fluid concentration of gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
AU - Togashi, Yosuke
AU - Masago, Katsuhiro
AU - Masuda, Satohiro
AU - Mizuno, Tomoyuki
AU - Fukudo, Masahide
AU - Ikemi, Yasuaki
AU - Sakamori, Yuichi
AU - Nagai, Hiroki
AU - Kim, Young Hak
AU - Katsura, Toshiya
AU - Mishima, Michiaki
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/9
Y1 - 2012/9
N2 - Purpose Several cases have been reported in which central nervous system (CNS) metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to gefitinib were improved by erlotinib. However, there has been no study in which cerebrospinal flid (CSF) concentrations of gefitinib and erlotinib are directly compared. Thus, we aimed to compare them. Methods We examined 15 Japanese patients with NSCLC and CNS metastases with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations who received CSF examinations during epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment (250 mg daily gefitinib or 150 mg daily erlotinib). Plasma and CSF concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Results The concentration and penetration rate of gefitinib (mean ± standard deviation) in the CSF were 3.7 ± 1.9 ng/mL (8.2 ± 4.3 nM) and 1.13 ± 0.36 %, respectively. The concentration and penetration rate of erlotinib in the CSF were 28.7 ± 16.8 ng/mL (66.9 ± 39.0 nM) and 2.77 ± 0.45 %, respectively. The CSF concentration and penetration rate of erlotinib were significantly higher than those of gefitinib (P = 0.0008 and <0.0001, respectively). The CNS response rates of patients with erlotinib treatment were preferentially (but not significantly) higher than those with gefitinib treatment. (1/3 vs. 4/7, respectively). Leptomeningeal metastases in one patient, which were refractory to gefitinib, dramatically responded to erlotinib. Conclusions This study suggested that higher CSF concentration could be achieved with erlotinib and that erlotinib could be more effective for the treatment for CNS metastases, especially leptomeningeal metastases, than gefitinib.
AB - Purpose Several cases have been reported in which central nervous system (CNS) metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to gefitinib were improved by erlotinib. However, there has been no study in which cerebrospinal flid (CSF) concentrations of gefitinib and erlotinib are directly compared. Thus, we aimed to compare them. Methods We examined 15 Japanese patients with NSCLC and CNS metastases with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations who received CSF examinations during epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment (250 mg daily gefitinib or 150 mg daily erlotinib). Plasma and CSF concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Results The concentration and penetration rate of gefitinib (mean ± standard deviation) in the CSF were 3.7 ± 1.9 ng/mL (8.2 ± 4.3 nM) and 1.13 ± 0.36 %, respectively. The concentration and penetration rate of erlotinib in the CSF were 28.7 ± 16.8 ng/mL (66.9 ± 39.0 nM) and 2.77 ± 0.45 %, respectively. The CSF concentration and penetration rate of erlotinib were significantly higher than those of gefitinib (P = 0.0008 and <0.0001, respectively). The CNS response rates of patients with erlotinib treatment were preferentially (but not significantly) higher than those with gefitinib treatment. (1/3 vs. 4/7, respectively). Leptomeningeal metastases in one patient, which were refractory to gefitinib, dramatically responded to erlotinib. Conclusions This study suggested that higher CSF concentration could be achieved with erlotinib and that erlotinib could be more effective for the treatment for CNS metastases, especially leptomeningeal metastases, than gefitinib.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866364723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866364723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00280-012-1929-4
DO - 10.1007/s00280-012-1929-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 22806307
AN - SCOPUS:84866364723
SN - 0344-5704
VL - 70
SP - 399
EP - 405
JO - Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
JF - Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
IS - 3
ER -