TY - JOUR
T1 - Breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
T2 - report of a nationwide survey by the CINV Study Group of Japan
AU - The CINV Study Group of Japan
AU - Tamura, Kazuo
AU - Aiba, Keisuke
AU - Saeki, Toshiaki
AU - Nakanishi, Yoichi
AU - Kamura, Toshiharu
AU - Baba, Hideo
AU - Yoshida, Kazuhiro
AU - Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
AU - Maehara, Yoshihiko
AU - Shimokawa, Mototsugu
AU - Hirata, Koichi
AU - Kitajima, Masaki
N1 - Funding Information:
We appreciate the support of Yukimi Itoh, Etsuko Kumakawa, Noriko Ikoma, Noriko Gushima, and Kazuko Nakata for registering and clearing the collected data. Above all, we also thank all the patients and investigators who participated in this study. This study was funded by the Public Health Research Foundation (Clinical trial registry Number: UMIN000005971).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - Background: We conducted a nationwide survey on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Japan and demonstrated good compliance with Japanese CINV guidelines, resulting in good control of vomiting. However, almost half the patients experienced breakthrough CINV. We analyzed the survey results in relationship to the management of patients with breakthrough CINV. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study analyzed data for 1910 patients in Japan scheduled for moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC and HEC, respectively). Patients who developed CINV despite prophylactic use of antiemetics were administered rescue drugs. Patients who received cisplatin-based HEC (C-HEC), non-cisplatin-based HEC (N-HEC), or MEC were evaluated separately. Results: A total of 989 patients experienced CINV, of whom 412 (44%) received rescue antiemetics during the study period. The rate at which patients with breakthrough CINV were started on rescue drugs ranged from 13% to 24%. Rescue drugs were given more frequently on days 2–4 for C-HEC and MEC and on days 1–2 for N-HEC. Eighty-six percent of patients received metoclopramide or domperidone. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, antipsychotics, and anti-anxiety drugs were used for 11–5% of patients. The mean duration of antiemetic use was 2.6 days. Conclusions: Fewer than half of the patients with breakthrough CINV were treated with rescue antiemetics, suggesting that CINV was mild in the remaining patients. However, CINV was sufficiently severe to prevent eating in other patients, indicating the need for new drugs with different mechanisms to control CINV.
AB - Background: We conducted a nationwide survey on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Japan and demonstrated good compliance with Japanese CINV guidelines, resulting in good control of vomiting. However, almost half the patients experienced breakthrough CINV. We analyzed the survey results in relationship to the management of patients with breakthrough CINV. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study analyzed data for 1910 patients in Japan scheduled for moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC and HEC, respectively). Patients who developed CINV despite prophylactic use of antiemetics were administered rescue drugs. Patients who received cisplatin-based HEC (C-HEC), non-cisplatin-based HEC (N-HEC), or MEC were evaluated separately. Results: A total of 989 patients experienced CINV, of whom 412 (44%) received rescue antiemetics during the study period. The rate at which patients with breakthrough CINV were started on rescue drugs ranged from 13% to 24%. Rescue drugs were given more frequently on days 2–4 for C-HEC and MEC and on days 1–2 for N-HEC. Eighty-six percent of patients received metoclopramide or domperidone. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, antipsychotics, and anti-anxiety drugs were used for 11–5% of patients. The mean duration of antiemetic use was 2.6 days. Conclusions: Fewer than half of the patients with breakthrough CINV were treated with rescue antiemetics, suggesting that CINV was mild in the remaining patients. However, CINV was sufficiently severe to prevent eating in other patients, indicating the need for new drugs with different mechanisms to control CINV.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85001124078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85001124078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10147-016-1069-7
DO - 10.1007/s10147-016-1069-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 27909835
AN - SCOPUS:85001124078
SN - 1341-9625
VL - 22
SP - 405
EP - 412
JO - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 2
ER -