TY - JOUR
T1 - Benchmarking analogue models of brittle thrust wedges
AU - Schreurs, Guido
AU - Buiter, Susanne J.H.
AU - Boutelier, Jennifer
AU - Burberry, Caroline
AU - Callot, Jean Paul
AU - Cavozzi, Cristian
AU - Cerca, Mariano
AU - Chen, Jian Hong
AU - Cristallini, Ernesto
AU - Cruden, Alexander R.
AU - Cruz, Leonardo
AU - Daniel, Jean Marc
AU - Da Poian, Gabriela
AU - Garcia, Victor H.
AU - Gomes, Caroline J.S.
AU - Grall, Céline
AU - Guillot, Yannick
AU - Guzmán, Cecilia
AU - Hidayah, Triyani Nur
AU - Hilley, George
AU - Klinkmüller, Matthias
AU - Koyi, Hemin A.
AU - Lu, Chia Yu
AU - Maillot, Bertrand
AU - Meriaux, Catherine
AU - Nilfouroushan, Faramarz
AU - Pan, Chang Chih
AU - Pillot, Daniel
AU - Portillo, Rodrigo
AU - Rosenau, Matthias
AU - Schellart, Wouter P.
AU - Schlische, Roy W.
AU - Take, Andy
AU - Vendeville, Bruno
AU - Vergnaud, Marine
AU - Vettori, Matteo
AU - Wang, Shih Hsien
AU - Withjack, Martha O.
AU - Yagupsky, Daniel
AU - Yamada, Yasuhiro
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by SNF Grant 200020-109320 , 200020-122143 and 200021-140608 (Guido Schreurs), Discovery and Equipment grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, NSERC (Alexander Cruden), the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (Fapemig) , CRA 871/06 (Caroline J.S. Gomes), and the Swedish Research Council , Grant 2008-3443 (Faramarz Nilfouroushan).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - We performed a quantitative comparison of brittle thrust wedge experiments to evaluate the variability among analogue models and to appraise the reproducibility and limits of model interpretation. Fifteen analogue modeling laboratories participated in this benchmark initiative. Each laboratory received a shipment of the same type of quartz and corundum sand and all laboratories adhered to a stringent model building protocol and used the same type of foil to cover base and sidewalls of the sandbox. Sieve structure, sifting height, filling rate, and details on off-scraping of excess sand followed prescribed procedures. Our analogue benchmark shows that even for simple plane-strain experiments with prescribed stringent model construction techniques, quantitative model results show variability, most notably for surface slope, thrust spacing and number of forward and backthrusts. One of the sources of the variability in model results is related to slight variations in how sand is deposited in the sandbox. Small changes in sifting height, sifting rate, and scraping will result in slightly heterogeneous material bulk densities, which will affect the mechanical properties of the sand, and will result in lateral and vertical differences in peak and boundary friction angles, as well as cohesion values once the model is constructed. Initial variations in basal friction are inferred to play the most important role in causing model variability. Our comparison shows that the human factor plays a decisive role, and even when one modeler repeats the same experiment, quantitative model results still show variability. Our observations highlight the limits of up-scaling quantitative analogue model results to nature or for making comparisons with numerical models. The frictional behavior of sand is highly sensitive to small variations in material state or experimental set-up, and hence, it will remain difficult to scale quantitative results such as number of thrusts, thrust spacing, and pop-up width from model to nature.
AB - We performed a quantitative comparison of brittle thrust wedge experiments to evaluate the variability among analogue models and to appraise the reproducibility and limits of model interpretation. Fifteen analogue modeling laboratories participated in this benchmark initiative. Each laboratory received a shipment of the same type of quartz and corundum sand and all laboratories adhered to a stringent model building protocol and used the same type of foil to cover base and sidewalls of the sandbox. Sieve structure, sifting height, filling rate, and details on off-scraping of excess sand followed prescribed procedures. Our analogue benchmark shows that even for simple plane-strain experiments with prescribed stringent model construction techniques, quantitative model results show variability, most notably for surface slope, thrust spacing and number of forward and backthrusts. One of the sources of the variability in model results is related to slight variations in how sand is deposited in the sandbox. Small changes in sifting height, sifting rate, and scraping will result in slightly heterogeneous material bulk densities, which will affect the mechanical properties of the sand, and will result in lateral and vertical differences in peak and boundary friction angles, as well as cohesion values once the model is constructed. Initial variations in basal friction are inferred to play the most important role in causing model variability. Our comparison shows that the human factor plays a decisive role, and even when one modeler repeats the same experiment, quantitative model results still show variability. Our observations highlight the limits of up-scaling quantitative analogue model results to nature or for making comparisons with numerical models. The frictional behavior of sand is highly sensitive to small variations in material state or experimental set-up, and hence, it will remain difficult to scale quantitative results such as number of thrusts, thrust spacing, and pop-up width from model to nature.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962070995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962070995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsg.2016.03.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jsg.2016.03.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84962070995
SN - 0191-8141
VL - 92
SP - 116
EP - 139
JO - Journal of Structural Geology
JF - Journal of Structural Geology
ER -