TY - JOUR
T1 - Are socialist domestic land grabs egalitarian? Insights from a case involving a rubber plantation in Dien Bien Province, Vietnam
AU - Van Duy, Luu
AU - Amekawa, Yuichiro
AU - Isoda, Hiroshi
AU - Nomura, Hisako
AU - Watanabe, Takaaki
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the Vietnamese Government for providing scholarship to the first author’s Ph.D. program at the Kyushu University. We wish to thank all villagers, officials and DBRC staff for their hospitality and collaboration in this study. We express special thanks to Mrs. Pham Hoai Thu; Mrs. Le Thi Thu Huong, Mr. Tran The Cuong, Mr. Nguyen Minh Duc, Mr. Trinh Cong Son, Mr. Tong Duy Hoai Vu for their great contributions to the field survey. And we note here our gratitude that this paper partly reflects the outcomes supported by The Foundation for Dietary Scientific Research , Japan. Last but not least, we also thank the Editor Sarah Turner and four anonymous reviewers for their very helpful and insightful comments.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the Vietnamese Government for providing scholarship to the first author's Ph.D. program at the Kyushu University. We wish to thank all villagers, officials and DBRC staff for their hospitality and collaboration in this study. We express special thanks to Mrs. Pham Hoai Thu; Mrs. Le Thi Thu Huong, Mr. Tran The Cuong, Mr. Nguyen Minh Duc, Mr. Trinh Cong Son, Mr. Tong Duy Hoai Vu for their great contributions to the field survey. And we note here our gratitude that this paper partly reflects the outcomes supported by The Foundation for Dietary Scientific Research, Japan. Last but not least, we also thank the Editor Sarah Turner and four anonymous reviewers for their very helpful and insightful comments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - This paper examines the land grab processes dominated by a domestic state-owned enterprise in Vietnam. We examine the case of a rubber plantation in an ethnic minority area in the Northwest of the country. In doing so, the paper seeks to address how the Vietnamese socialist State – often considered a ‘strong state’ because it has pursued egalitarian land distribution policies over the past three decades – proceeds with domestic land grabbing in a context where the local people follow customary land use practices. The field research revealed the following. First, the Vietnamese government, while maintaining land distribution policies for its rural farming population, has increasingly sought to bring these policies more in line with the global trend of large-scale land acquisition at the expense of the traditional interests and livelihoods of the local population. By seeking to justify their essentially non-egalitarian land grab processes through the policy of post-land grab ‘egalitarian land re-distributions’ in areas with disembedded customary control, the domestic state actors deployed a cunning duplicity in their persistent adherence to agrarian egalitarianism. Second, with the supports from the local and central governments, a state-owned enterprise named Vietnam Rubber Group, carved out its land grab processes with more freedom, leverage, and power than similar firms investing abroad through land concessions. Last, the post-land grab redistribution of land rights materializes state formation through re-territorialization of and re-legalization within the frontier zone.
AB - This paper examines the land grab processes dominated by a domestic state-owned enterprise in Vietnam. We examine the case of a rubber plantation in an ethnic minority area in the Northwest of the country. In doing so, the paper seeks to address how the Vietnamese socialist State – often considered a ‘strong state’ because it has pursued egalitarian land distribution policies over the past three decades – proceeds with domestic land grabbing in a context where the local people follow customary land use practices. The field research revealed the following. First, the Vietnamese government, while maintaining land distribution policies for its rural farming population, has increasingly sought to bring these policies more in line with the global trend of large-scale land acquisition at the expense of the traditional interests and livelihoods of the local population. By seeking to justify their essentially non-egalitarian land grab processes through the policy of post-land grab ‘egalitarian land re-distributions’ in areas with disembedded customary control, the domestic state actors deployed a cunning duplicity in their persistent adherence to agrarian egalitarianism. Second, with the supports from the local and central governments, a state-owned enterprise named Vietnam Rubber Group, carved out its land grab processes with more freedom, leverage, and power than similar firms investing abroad through land concessions. Last, the post-land grab redistribution of land rights materializes state formation through re-territorialization of and re-legalization within the frontier zone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086390943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85086390943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.06.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85086390943
SN - 0016-7185
VL - 114
SP - 89
EP - 106
JO - Geoforum
JF - Geoforum
ER -