TY - GEN
T1 - An authentication method with spatiotemporal interval and partial matching
AU - Tsunoda, Masateru
AU - Fushida, Kyohei
AU - Kamei, Yasutaka
AU - Nakamura, Masahide
AU - Mitsui, Kohei
AU - Goto, Keita
AU - Matsumoto, Kenichi
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In past research, we proposed an authentication method that combines actions with spatiotemporal information such as location, time, and distance. With the method, a user succeeds in authentication when he/she performs preset actions such as pushing button n times on preset intervals defined by spatiotemporal information. In this paper, we improve the authentication method using a partial matching method. We propose two kinds of partial matching methods for pushing button and interval. A type I method assumes the number of pushing button is sometimes less than preset count, but the number never exceeds it, and a user never pushes the button out of preset areas. A type II method assumes the number of pushing button is less or more than preset count occasionally, and a user pushes the button out of preset areas. We showed how to calculate FAR when the type I or II is applied. In the experiment, we compared the type I and II methods with a conventional method to evaluate their security. As a result, the type I method improved false acceptance rate (FAR) from 0.097% to 0.053%. The type II method improved FAR from 0.097% to 0.035%.
AB - In past research, we proposed an authentication method that combines actions with spatiotemporal information such as location, time, and distance. With the method, a user succeeds in authentication when he/she performs preset actions such as pushing button n times on preset intervals defined by spatiotemporal information. In this paper, we improve the authentication method using a partial matching method. We propose two kinds of partial matching methods for pushing button and interval. A type I method assumes the number of pushing button is sometimes less than preset count, but the number never exceeds it, and a user never pushes the button out of preset areas. A type II method assumes the number of pushing button is less or more than preset count occasionally, and a user pushes the button out of preset areas. We showed how to calculate FAR when the type I or II is applied. In the experiment, we compared the type I and II methods with a conventional method to evaluate their security. As a result, the type I method improved false acceptance rate (FAR) from 0.097% to 0.053%. The type II method improved FAR from 0.097% to 0.035%.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885984191&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885984191&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/SNPD.2013.29
DO - 10.1109/SNPD.2013.29
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84885984191
SN - 9780769550053
T3 - SNPD 2013 - 14th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing
SP - 535
EP - 542
BT - SNPD 2013 - 14th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing
T2 - 14th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, SNPD 2013
Y2 - 1 July 2013 through 3 July 2013
ER -