TY - JOUR
T1 - A minimally invasive registration method using Surface Template-Assisted Marker Positioning (STAMP) for image-guided otologic surgery
AU - Matsumoto, Nozomu
AU - Hong, Jaesung
AU - Hashizume, Makoto
AU - Komune, Shizuo
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) No. 20689031 from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for N.M.
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - Objective: A new, minimally invasive registration method was developed for image-guided otologic surgery. We utilized laser-sintered template of the patient's bone surface to transfer the virtual markers to the patient's bone intraoperatively and eliminated the necessity for preoperative marker positioning or additional CT scan. Study Design: Simulation surgeries and clinical application. Subjects and Methods: We measured registration errors in 10 trials using replicas and six ear surgeries (two cochlear implant insertions, four translabyrinthine acoustic tumor removals). Results: The target registration errors varied among the surgical targets. Errors were less than 1 mm near the cochlear implant insertion target both in phantom study and in actual surgeries. Conclusion: Our newly developed method reduced the preoperative procedures for patients but did not reduce the accuracy in cochlear implant surgery. Our method would be a useful image-guided surgery method in the field of otology, where both accuracy and noninvasiveness are required.
AB - Objective: A new, minimally invasive registration method was developed for image-guided otologic surgery. We utilized laser-sintered template of the patient's bone surface to transfer the virtual markers to the patient's bone intraoperatively and eliminated the necessity for preoperative marker positioning or additional CT scan. Study Design: Simulation surgeries and clinical application. Subjects and Methods: We measured registration errors in 10 trials using replicas and six ear surgeries (two cochlear implant insertions, four translabyrinthine acoustic tumor removals). Results: The target registration errors varied among the surgical targets. Errors were less than 1 mm near the cochlear implant insertion target both in phantom study and in actual surgeries. Conclusion: Our newly developed method reduced the preoperative procedures for patients but did not reduce the accuracy in cochlear implant surgery. Our method would be a useful image-guided surgery method in the field of otology, where both accuracy and noninvasiveness are required.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149088094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149088094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.005
DO - 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 19130970
AN - SCOPUS:58149088094
SN - 0194-5998
VL - 140
SP - 96
EP - 102
JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
IS - 1
ER -