A comparison of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with cirrhosis

Hiroshi Saeki, Daisuke Korenaga, Hirohiko Yamaga, Kyotaro Mawatari, Hiroyuki Orita, Hidetoshi Itasaka, Kazuhiro Yano, Soichiro Maekawa, Yoichi Muto, Toshihiko Ikeda, Keizo Sugimachi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)


To evaluate the benefits of performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with cirrhosis, data on 13 patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent cholecystectomy for gallstones between 1989 and 1995 were retrospectively collected from charts filed at Fukuoka City Hospital. These 13 patients were classified into two groups; one, comprised of 7 who underwent LC, and another, comprised of 6 who underwent open cholecystectomy (OC). No statistical differences were observed in the duration of surgery or the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups; however, the C-reactive protein (CRP) level in the serum was significantly higher in the OC group than in the LC group. LC was followed by a significantly earlier resumption of a normal diet (P < 0.05) and a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.05) in comparison to OC. All of the patients who underwent OC had an uneventful clinical course; however, one of the patients who underwent LC suffered from intractable ascites postoperatively. The difference in the cost of hospitalization between the two groups was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that the therapeutic significance of performing LC in patients with cirrhosis should be assessed after carefully evaluating all factors including mortality, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness. Thus, further controlled trials are necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-413
Number of pages3
JournalSurgery today
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with cirrhosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this