TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative study of sensible energy storage and hydrogen energy storage apropos to a concentrated solar thermal power plant
AU - Mukherjee, Shubha Sankar
AU - Meshram, Himani Anand
AU - Rakshit, Dibakar
AU - Saha, Bidyut Baran
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Yardi Systems for providing the necessary resources to carry out the present study under the research grants titled “Design and Demonstration of Sustainable Building Infrastructure” - Grant number- IITD/IRD/RP03743/111718, and Department of Science and Technology, Government of India “Different Energy Vector Integration for Storage of Energy” - Grant number- TMD/CERI/MICALL19/2020/03(G).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - To achieve dispatchable and reliable power generation through renewable sources, energy storage is often indispensable. This paper attempts a quantitative investigation and comparison between two different energy storage technologies, Thermal Energy Storage System (TESS), which is already mature, and Hydrogen Energy Storage System (HESS), applied to a common concentrated solar thermal power (CSP) plant. A solar field (SF) comprising parabolic troughs and molten salt as a heat transfer fluid is conceived with a power block running on the Rankine cycle. An integrated TESS system is first considered, and the SF size is iteratively determined, so that plant with TESS has a capacity factor of 100 % for a typical summer day, thereby standardizing the TESS performance. The TESS is then replaced with the HESS, keeping the same SF capacity. The plant capacity and storage performances are then compared with simplistic assumptions. The results show superior TESS performance, while HESS delivers only 58 % capacity factor. TESS also delivers superior energy and power density (68 kWh/m3 and 4.5 kW/m3 for TESS, as opposed to 26 kWh/m3 and 1.8 kWh/m3 for HESS, respectively). However, the specific energy and power for both are comparable (approx. 93 Wh/kg and 6 W/kg, respectively). Although electrolyzer and fuel cell efficiencies individually outperform Rankine efficiency, HESS lags in performance with CSP configuration due to multiple steps of energy conversion.
AB - To achieve dispatchable and reliable power generation through renewable sources, energy storage is often indispensable. This paper attempts a quantitative investigation and comparison between two different energy storage technologies, Thermal Energy Storage System (TESS), which is already mature, and Hydrogen Energy Storage System (HESS), applied to a common concentrated solar thermal power (CSP) plant. A solar field (SF) comprising parabolic troughs and molten salt as a heat transfer fluid is conceived with a power block running on the Rankine cycle. An integrated TESS system is first considered, and the SF size is iteratively determined, so that plant with TESS has a capacity factor of 100 % for a typical summer day, thereby standardizing the TESS performance. The TESS is then replaced with the HESS, keeping the same SF capacity. The plant capacity and storage performances are then compared with simplistic assumptions. The results show superior TESS performance, while HESS delivers only 58 % capacity factor. TESS also delivers superior energy and power density (68 kWh/m3 and 4.5 kW/m3 for TESS, as opposed to 26 kWh/m3 and 1.8 kWh/m3 for HESS, respectively). However, the specific energy and power for both are comparable (approx. 93 Wh/kg and 6 W/kg, respectively). Although electrolyzer and fuel cell efficiencies individually outperform Rankine efficiency, HESS lags in performance with CSP configuration due to multiple steps of energy conversion.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147438877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147438877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.est.2023.106629
DO - 10.1016/j.est.2023.106629
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147438877
SN - 2352-152X
VL - 61
JO - Journal of Energy Storage
JF - Journal of Energy Storage
M1 - 106629
ER -